Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What does ABB mean?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:41 PM
Original message
What does ABB mean?
Edited on Tue Oct-21-03 11:46 PM by Terwilliger
I know it's very much like "Anyone But Bush"...but...

does that include Lieberman?

does that include Nader?

does that include the Libertarian candidate?


I want to know...how does ABB work if the candidate is not someone you waqnt to run for president?

OnEdit: drunken-speel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alexwcovington Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Anyone who gets the Dem nomination
If that happens to be Nader...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. ABB = Apathy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IranianDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Care to elaborate?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. ABB = unswerving comittment to a single goal at any cost
So shaddap. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. 'ABB = the label is important, the substance not'
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 09:31 AM by Mairead
Which I suppose could be construed as a special type of apathy.

ABB says as long as the candidate has a Dem label on, it's good enough. Even if that candidate would have been just as satisfied with a GOP label. Superficialities matter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. God that is so shallow
C'mon?!?! It really has NOTHING to do with a label. Shit I'd even take a thougtful, intelligent REPUBLICAN (McCain, Dole, shit even Orin Hatch) over these fascist idiots.

Voter apathy has been an American epedemic for, oh, only a several decades now. This is NOT a case of it.

As I've said before, ABB, LIEberman, Nader, a baloney sandwich. They are all a vast improvement over this regime that collectively thinks they are annointed by god to save rich people by securing business deals at the cost of working people, the world community, and the environment. They could give a damn what happens to this country becasue, like that abortion doctor killer in Fla., they truly believe thier righteous god awaits them with open, loving arms for doing his duty.

Anybody but Bush? Damn fuckin' straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. What? ABB is shallow? I agree!
It's like saying 'there's nothing worse than being eaten alive by piranha'. That might be true enough, but there's still a vast difference between being crushed to death by a boa constrictor and being given a million dollars. Saying that eliminating the piranha solves the problem--that's shallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #42
44. Your analogy
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 10:17 AM by hiphopnation23
while cute, doesn't really address my point. I will play along, nonetheless, out of the spirit of gayety (gritting teeth, trying to control anger).

Right now we are not on land where the boa constrictor danger is real and imminent; indeed, we are UP TO OUR NECKS in stinking, pond-scum-like-water and there are piranhas circling at an ever quickening pace. That is the issue at hand.

So tell me, why on earth would I be entertaining the purely academic and hypothetical question of 'how much better it would be to be given a million dollars than being crushed by a boa constrictor' while the piranhas are beginning to nip at my toes? To me, it's a counter-intuitive, and more importantly, deadly notion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-23-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #44
61. What makes you think it's academic?
Edited on Thu Oct-23-03 05:30 PM by Mairead
To continue the metaphor: here you are, up to your neck in the scummy water with the piranha nosing around and getting ready to have a go at you. You look around for an escape. There are seven pathways, possibly out of the swamp, but occupied by constrictors of various sizes. There are also two clear pathways well signed 'this way to the egress' and with satchels stuffed with Euros. Do you opt for getting a hug from one of the constrictors? I wouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. For me.
It means any registered Democrat, which I suppose would include Lieberman. If there were no Democrats on the ballot, then I suppose it would include anyone but Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes to
all of the above. To me, Bush and his minions are so evil I will vote and work to defeat him. I don't choose any of those you list, but they are at least thoughtful and believe in the values of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. at the march Saturday?
bring friends! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah, I'll be there
but I don't know where to meet. Please send a PM or post. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, I read somewhere that it even includes a baloney sandwich.
I'm not sure though if the sandwich has to have a big 'D' emblazoned on its jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think
it means whoever gets the nomination. Now, there are some common-sense things to be applied here. For example, Lieberman falls into this, which freaks people out. But a shrewd political eye says he has no chance at the nomination. Ditto Libertarians, Greens, etc.

Mostly, it's a safe bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-03 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. ABB means if the candidate your supporting doesn't get the nod...
suck it up, hold your nose, fall in line and vote the little flying monkey out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bearfartinthewoods Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 08:52 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. and if you live in NE PA.get as drunk as you need to be
give me a call and i'll give you a ride to the polls.

what a minute....i'll likely be drunk too. oh...that's right, i don't get drunk anymore.

bearfart....your sober, designated driver to the polls..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Is Futile Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Anyone Better than shrub
I think of the first 'b' as standing for 'better than' rather than 'but.' Lieberman fails this test. Pretty much everyone else on offer, including Nader and whoever the Libertarians are running passes it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
not systems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
13. Vote against Bush.
On election day their will be one candidate who
can possibly beat Bush.

Vote for that candidate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
14. I wish Ralph would run as a Democrat in the primaries.
Then we'd finally see how popular he really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. He can't because he's not a Democrat.
Before he got drafted by the Greenies he was a registered Republican from my sources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Independant, n/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Nobody claims he's particularly popular. The point about Nader is not
that he's popular -- it's that he dares to speak the truth far more often than politicians of either party.

No one says he's popular; no one says he's perfect. His following exists because ALL Republicans are full of sh*t, MOST Democrats are full of sh*t, and Ralph has a more cogent & penetrating analysis of our society's weaknesses than they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. I agree...
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 01:21 AM by FDRrocks
It takes an outsider. Beyond that, Ralph has chosen his path well. I am amazed to see DU constantly in amazement at (D) voting record (recently: partial birth), yet they attack the leftist party.

If the Democrats remain centrist with a possibility of a leftward swing long after I am dead, than what is my Dem. vote motivated by. Right now, it is b/c of a far rightwing swing in this country, and it is ONLY in this situation. If they let this progress further, then 3rd party all the way.

They argue that this is a 2 party system... hah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Thats why I wonder with my views and all being pretty left
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 01:22 AM by JohnKleeb
Whether its worth it. Its like the total opposite of what I admired, too bad if the party becomes centrist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. I'd rather see him run as a Republican or go fuck himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FDRrocks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
15. Yes.
Anyone but bush... pretty much explains itself... if Satan runs as a democrat, vote for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. No, it doesn't
as evidenced here in this thread, it means "Any Democrat..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. All About Bush
ABB really stands for "All About Bush". The next election is more of a "yes" or "no" vote for Bush. We are motivated by our hatred of Bush more than the merits of any one candidate.

But that doesn't mean we can't be critical of the other candidates, it just means our first priority is to see Bush defeated. This is a realization that we will have to be willing to compromise more than usual this election. Every DU candidate vs. candidate debate is really about electability, punctuated by our resentment for being in such a dire position of compromise. But the True ABBers realize they don't have the luxury of setting too many conditions on our support, because we imagine the worst if Bush serves a second term. And Bush has given us no reason to think otherwise.

IMO, anybody who's saying they won't vote for _____ if he gets nominated is just being a drama queen, they know that person won't get nominated anyways so it's safe to say it, or they romanticise their vote as doing something different than what it really does. It's a silly manipulation tactic that will become either an idle threat or sabotage. Or maybe they think Bush isn't that bad? I can't imagine anyone in DU truly thinks that there is a single candidate - even Nader - who is worse than Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #43
49. How about Allan Keyes?
or Lindy LaRouche?

ABB paints people as have nothing new to offer...just a resounding "hatred" of Bush. While that MAY win a few converts, many will be offended by the notion that Bush is someone anything less than honorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. It means literally ANY thing but Bush. A hedge, deciduous or
evergreen. Anything but *. Unless Satan himself comes up as the Dem candidate, I'm voting for the Dem. nom. If some freak accident happens or the GOP offs the nom, I'll write the next likely Dem in. If there is no clear next Dem, I'll write in my concience. If all the above fail, I will write in my cat, or whoever may have any shot at winning.

Anything but *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Is Futile Donating Member (693 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Satan would be an improvement
God, on the other hand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #22
56. I'd vote for satan
and I'm RC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Booberdawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. Means the Democratic nominee
even it that is a ham sandwich or a dog's hairy asshole - it's still better that bush*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tanketra Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Frankly? I think it's a code-word
It has a lot in common with the way some people used "states' rights" to justify discrimination or religious intolerance, or how "I have nothing against Islam" is usually the first line in a diatribe against Muslims.

Is there anyone on this board that's saying to themselves "You know, I like Bush a lot. Hopefully somebody better will come along, but he's a good plan B."? Somehow, I don't think so -- even trolls likely wouldn't be saying that (since Bush would be their Plan A).

Then, why the emphasis on ABB?

So one can follow it up with an explanation on why YOUR guy is unelectable, and we'd all be fools of the highest caliber to nominate him. Any criticism of MY guy, mind you, is irrelevant, because I only want to see Bush defeated by whatever means necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #25
36. Nice one!
I've had some ill-formed ideas along that same line -- that it's a way to constrain or even eliminate substantive discourse -- but you articulated them much better than I. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. This party is experiencing technical difficulties. Please vote for our...
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 08:13 AM by JVS
candidate in 2004 and we will attempt to rectify these problems in the not too distant future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. Har! I'd argue that they leave off any mention of time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. It's dangerously simplistic on its face
I think it's meant mainly to get the Dean and Kerry people to get along better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
30. Don't be so literal
Though the literal meaning of the words indicate that ANYONE, including Nader or even Pat Buchanan, would be acceptable, the context provided by the numerous discussions on DU should have provided a fairly strong clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. yes...that ABB is another lie...
from a bunch of liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. I have never said it
and never would, because you're right, it would be lying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. It's an ill-conceived mantra
and it paints the whole party as simply "Bush haters"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
31. Ya Mean... It's Not...


Take a chance on me?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. hahah
I think you need another A! Don't forget Andersson!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #33
46. But Andersson is terrible.
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 10:17 AM by JVS
That club is for people who are fans of the first three names in ABBA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
40. To a Black person it means
Never mind that 40 acres and a mule you never got- now we're coming back to take your vote.

Back to the corporate cotton fields for you!

Well, hell no! I'm still holding out for my mule and my 40 acres!

ABB is just sick, slick pre-conditioning to accept whatever candidate corporate money and interests can push through.

ABB is a way of shutting up the Progressives, the Leftists while retaining their vote. Does the DLC think people were born yesterday and can't hear the storm-troopers at the door?

As I said in another thread- I earned my right to vote; let the person I vote for earn that vote. I won't rubber-stamp another head of the Hydra just because of an insignificant D trailer.

I may, at the polls, vote for whatever ABB candidate they shovel through but that will be up to me and my conscience. I'm not taking any stupid pledge so they can securely start counting their votes now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Not to the Black people I know`
If anything, they're more ABB than most other people I know.

ABB is not a "pledge", it's an opinion, as demonstrated by the fact that no one has asked you to pledge anything.

ABB is not some sinister plot to shut up Progressives, as demonstrated by the fact that many Progressives agree with ABB. Also, the only place I hear about ABB is on DU. I doubt that DU is the source of an anti-Progressive movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. I've seen numerous threads asking people to take the ABB pledge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #47
50. Link?
I think you are exagerrating. The threads I remember asked who agreed with ABB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #50
53. right....and THAT's not discriminatory, nor leading
those threads were just trying to find out "whether your for us, or agin' us!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Terwilliger, would you please find a link for sangh0?
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 11:03 AM by JVS
I have no star and can't do a search. But I think that there was something along the lines of "Take the ABB pledge".

It was all very reminiscent of one of those High-school prom promise deals where they ask the kids who will pledge not to drive drunk, but a lot of people here refused to sign on and instead said that they see no need for loyalty oaths in politics.

On edit: or don't. We all know what we saw, no need to convince him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. Actually, I remember that one
but I would point out that ONE thread ASKING (not demanding) is not quite as serious a threat as some people's heated rhetoric would lead us to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #57
59. It comes up in thread after thread
Accusatory posts attempting to arm-twist, screams of "so you want Bush?". I could if you want PM them to you but in about a week, you'd have a big angry flashing red banner in your in-box saying "Warning! Your in-box is too big! Please delete messages immediately" It's a horrible sight, those huge red flashing letters...

ABN is woven all over the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. More rhetoric
"Arm-twisting"? Isn't that kind of hard to do over the Internet? I could just as easily characterize your post as an attempt to "arm-twist" me into agreeing that people were "arm-twisting" others to take "the pledge"

It's called debate, and it's expected on a website devoted to politics. Basically, your complaint is some people are assholes, and they include some ABBers. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
45. ABB = Voting for the most likely person to oust Bush.
That would be the Democratic nominee.

Yes that included Lieberman. And, Nader if he becomes the Democratic nominee.

The Democratic nominee is the 'only' person with a chance to beat Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #45
51. so ADBHNB
Any Democrat Because He's Not Bush?

or would that be...

ODBOTCBB

Only Democrats Because Only They Can Beat Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gully Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #51
55. Well you could say....
Any Democrat, Or Any One Else That Becomes The Most Likely Candidate To Beat Bush, Because The Differences Make A Difference In The Lives Of Ordinary Americans.

ADOAOETBTMLCTBBBTDMADITLOOA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #55
58. yes
"we happy to be slaves, cuz we needs to eats us some gruel and have a thatch roof o'er our heads, and a dirt floor, because if we don't have that..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diplomats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
48. To me, it means I'll vote for the Dem nominee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-22-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #48
52. so the literal translation not being accurate...
Edited on Wed Oct-22-03 10:53 AM by Terwilliger
is not a problem for you?

I know you, diplomats, and I know you do not want Bush to regain the presidency. How do you think "ABB" plays to people outside of the Democratic party? Do you think that sentiment will mean "I'll vote for the Dem nominee" to the average, less partisan voter?

OnEdit: s&p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC