Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Say It: This Is a Quagmire - By Tom Hayden, AlterNet

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-07-03 11:44 PM
Original message
Say It: This Is a Quagmire - By Tom Hayden, AlterNet
http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=16336

On the day U.S. soldiers occupied Baghdad, draped the American flag over Saddam Hussein's statue and pulled it down, 103 GIs had died in the Iraq war. The number killed since that supposedly triumphal moment on April 9 may double in this coming week, in a war that an American general now admits is ongoing.

The total number of American soldiers killed since the toppling of Saddam's statue is 93 by July 4, including the nine Americans killed in the bombing in Saudi Arabia. That makes a total of 196 dead so far, not including the six British soldiers killed last month.

The media is being forced to recognize this reality, but continues to minimize the numbers. Using the definition "killed in hostile encounters" and May 1 as the date when President Bush declared the cessation of hostilities, the reported death toll is lowered to "about 24" Americans, according to the New York Times front-page spin based on figures from Paul Bremer III. (NYT, July 4). The official non-fatal casualty number acknowledged since May 1 is 177 Americans. Most of the dead and wounded are grunts, "low-ranking ground troops who are performing mundane activities like buying a video, going out on patrol, or guarding a trash pit."

The manipulation of the American body count, like the earlier manipulation of the costs of war and occupation, only feeds the growing anger among military personnel and their families, as cited in the New York Times. During the Vietnam war, troop demoralization rose as Americans continued to die while President Nixon promised that the war was winding down. A similar phenomenon appears to be happening already in the 115-degree temperatures of occupied Iraq. No one wants to sacrifice his life for President Bush after he's held an aircraft-carrier press conference declaring "mission accomplished." No family wants the death of a son or daughter minimized to airbrush the President's victory image.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent article. This says it all. The big "Q"
Quagmire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrdinaryTa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Demoralized Troops
During the Vietnam war, troop demoralization rose as Americans continued to die while President Nixon promised that the war was winding down

There's a substantial difference between unhappy troops and demoralized troops. One important function of basic training is to put troops under stress to teach them that warfare is uncomfortable. But demoralization is something different - it causes the troops to be ineffective. Discipline breaks down, soldiers fight among themselves and refuse to obey orders, or they become deserters. In Vietnam they became drug abusers as well. Low morale forced Nixon to get serious about winding down the war, but it was more than that the troops were unhappy. That didn't bother him at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ward919 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do you think Bush will preside over the first military coup in US history?
It's stuff like this that revolutions are made of. If the flower children had not been "mellowed out" on pot, and respected our soldiers it might have happened in the 60's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Quaghdad, Iraqnam
And it's one, two, three, what are we fighting for?
Don't ask me I don't give a damn.
Next stop it's IRAQNAM!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. "Saddam Hussein City"??
How long before we change maps of Iraq? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC