Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Techno-Voting Nightmare... Drip... Drip... Drip...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 05:49 AM
Original message
The Techno-Voting Nightmare... Drip... Drip... Drip...
<snip>

Imagine that a rogue programmer gets access to a few networks of computers in the California special gubernatorial election. The programmer manipulates the software to count wrong, making sure that Darrell Issa or whoever is running on the Republican ticket gets 10% more votes than the voters really gave him. This software "fix" will do it's work then delete itself. The program can be made to randomize the bogus numbers so they are a little different percentage at each voting location.

Now imagine that this is not some independently acting rogue programmer. What if he works for the company and the company is currying favor for or selling power to the candidate or even to unidentified backers-- like some of the wealthy oil people who have funded attack ads for George Bush in the past. This is no far-fetched scenario. There are a lot of us who believe it has already happened.

As a businessman with experience with software design, creation and support, I know how easy it is to change the numbers a program supplies-- the results-- by manipulating underlying aspects of the software. It's easy to do it so no end user would realize it. It's easy to do it so the evidence of manipulations, like the old Mission Impossible tape recorder, destroy themselves and disappear.

Of course there are other ways to fix elections, Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris showed us that in Florida, with Greg Palast's and Michael Moore's books spelling out the details of their vote corruption. So we need to be careful about a plethora of means the far right can and probably will use to corrupt future elections.

<snip>

More: http://www.opednews.com/Kall_computervoting2.htm

And... Notice who's site is cited at the bottom!!!

:bounce::kick::bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. there's a silver lining
rogue programmers despise authority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Some of them are just mercenaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. isn't there also a connect with the religious right crazies?
seems like i've read or heard that the people who own and operate the voting machines are heavy contributors to bushco and are on the extreme far right born again fringes. heard anything about this angle?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 06:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, I've Read That Here Also !!!
Can't cite it chapter and verse (sorry about the pun), but I think Bev Harris's site has a bunch of info on that angle.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Howard Ahmanson, Christian Reconstruction
The Ahmanson family is heavily invested in voting machine ownership, as well as being involved in the Christian Reconstruction movement. The latter is a radical fundy sect that believes only Xians should have the vote, and just about any taliban-style repressive theocratic tenet you'd care to name. Basically they want a "Christian" version of shari'a law for the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. How about a hacker with a sense of humor
giving 51% of the vote to write-in candidate Rowen Atkinson. That ought to get an investigation started.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-28-03 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. check out these sights if you doubt tampering, involving senator Hagel
Republican senator Hagel has serious personal/financial involvement in voting machines that count 80% of his votes, just type in 'senator hagel voting machines' this is stuff that should be on CNN 24/7 instead of the crap they burry the truth with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC