Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

USA's Trade in Chemical Arms Allowed Despite Their Use on Iranians, Kurds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:17 AM
Original message
USA's Trade in Chemical Arms Allowed Despite Their Use on Iranians, Kurds
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 10:23 AM by NNN0LHI
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer

U.S. Had Key Role in Iraq Buildup
Trade in Chemical Arms Allowed Despite Their Use on Iranians, Kurds

By Michael Dobbs
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, December 30, 2002; Page A01


<snip>...What U.S. officials rarely acknowledge is that these offenses date back to a period when Hussein was seen in Washington as a valued ally.

Among the people instrumental in tilting U.S. policy toward Baghdad during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war was Donald H. Rumsfeld, now defense secretary, whose December 1983 meeting with Hussein as a special presidential envoy paved the way for normalization of U.S.-Iraqi relations. Declassified documents show that Rumsfeld traveled to Baghdad at a time when Iraq was using chemical weapons on an "almost daily" basis in defiance of international conventions.

The story of U.S. involvement with Saddam Hussein in the years before his 1990 attack on Kuwait -- which included large-scale intelligence sharing, supply of cluster bombs through a Chilean front company, and facilitating Iraq's acquisition of chemical and biological precursors -- is a topical example of the underside of U.S. foreign policy. It is a world in which deals can be struck with dictators, human rights violations sometimes overlooked, and accommodations made with arms proliferators, all on the principle that the "enemy of my enemy is my friend."

Throughout the 1980s, Hussein's Iraq was the sworn enemy of Iran, then still in the throes of an Islamic revolution. U.S. officials saw Baghdad as a bulwark against militant Shiite extremism and the fall of pro-American states such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and even Jordan -- a Middle East version of the "domino theory" in Southeast Asia. That was enough to turn Hussein into a strategic partner and for U.S. diplomats in Baghdad to routinely refer to Iraqi forces as "the good guys," in contrast to the Iranians, who were depicted as "the bad guys."

A review of thousands of declassified government documents and interviews with former policymakers shows that U.S. intelligence and logistical support played a crucial role in shoring up Iraqi defenses against the "human wave" attacks by suicidal Iranian troops. The administrations of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush authorized the sale to Iraq of numerous items that had both military and civilian applications, including poisonous chemicals and deadly biological viruses, such as anthrax and bubonic plague.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick because I want to see if some drug addicted radio personalities...
...will read this one on the air today.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick it again for ChickenHawk Rush who avoided Vietnam for a...
...boil on his ass. Here Rush. This one is for you.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sistersofmercy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Not only that but they also supplied arms and intelligence to Iran
during the Iran/Iraq war. The Iranians had foreknowledge of the attack that happened to the Kurdish village, it was the Iranians who slipped western reporters across the border into Iraq for the filming after the smoke cleared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Iran-contra affair
http://www.bartleby.com/65/ir/Irancont.html

<snip>in U.S. history, secret arrangement in the 1980s to provide funds to the Nicaraguan contra rebels from profits gained by selling arms to Iran. The Iran-contra affair was the product of two separate initiatives during the administration of President Ronald Reagan. The first was a commitment to aid the contras who were conducting a guerrilla war against the Sandinista government of Nicaragua. The second was to placate “moderates” within the Iranian government in order to secure the release of American hostages held by pro-Iranian groups in Lebanon and to influence Iranian foreign policy in a pro-Western direction.


Despite the strong opposition of the Reagan administration, the Democratic-controlled Congress enacted legislation, known as the Boland amendments, that prohibited the Defense Dept., the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or any other government agency from providing military aid to the contras from Dec., 1983, to Sept., 1985. The Reagan administration circumvented these limitations by using the National Security Council (NSC), which was not explicitly covered by the law, to supervise covert military aid to the contras. Under Robert McFarlane (1983–85) and John Poindexter (1985–86) the NSC raised private and foreign funds for the contras. This operation was directed by NSC staffer Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North. McFarlane and North were also the central figures in the plan to secretly ship arms to Iran despite a U.S. trade and arms embargo.


In early Nov., 1986, the scandal broke when reports in Lebanese newspapers forced the Reagan administration to disclose the arms deals. Poindexter resigned before the end of the month; North was fired. Select congressional committees held joint hearings, and in Dec., 1986, Lawrence E. Walsh was named as special prosecutor to investigate the affair. Higher administration officials, particularly Reagan, Vice President Bush, and William J. Casey (former director of the CIA, who died in May, 1987), were implicated in some testimony, but the extent of their involvement remained unclear. North said he believed Reagan was largely aware of the secret arrangement, and the independent prosecutor’s report (1994) said that Reagan and Bush had some knowledge of the affair or its coverup. Reagan and Bush both claimed to have been uninformed about the details of the affair, and no evidence was found to link them to any crime. A presidential commission was critical of the NSC, while congressional hearings uncovered a web of official deception, mismanagement, and illegality.


A number of criminal convictions resulted, including those of McFarlane, North, and Poindexter, but North’s and Poindexter’s were vacated on appeal because of immunity agreements with the Senate concerning their testimony. Former State Dept. and CIA officials pleaded guilty in 1991 to withholding information about the contra aid from Congress, and Caspar Weinberger, defense secretary under Reagan, was charged (1992) with the same offense. In 1992 then-president Bush pardoned Weinberger and other officials who had been indicted or convicted for withholding information on or obstructing investigation of the affair. The Iran-contra affair raised serious questions about the nature and scope of congressional oversight of foreign affairs and the limits of the executive branch.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Congressional hearings?
Why yes, Virginia, that was the very same Lee Hamilton running Iran/Contra hearings back then, like the 911 commission now. And yes, there are claims that Hamilton kept GHW Bush and chums safely in the shadows of Iran/Contra. And, coincidentally, GW Bush has, by executive order, locked away from historians and investigators the WH papers from that period, in defiance of laws passed by Congress to open them up.

How many formerly convicted Iran/Contra felons has aWol's gang hired back? Three, four, five? It must be like home-coming for Lee and the gang.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. do you have a source on the foreknowledge bit?
Edited on Tue Dec-16-03 10:50 PM by Aidoneus
I know they were the first to bus in reporters, as it was southern Kurds fighting on Iran's side that were hit by the Iraqi gas, but hadn't heard a claim of foreknowledge before..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick because they can't blame this on Clinton n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleRob Donating Member (893 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. and remember...
Rummy's famous Saddam Handshake was related to working on a pipeline deal for Bechtel. (It's in the declassified Documents) Former Reagan?Bush Cabinet member George Shultz is on the Board of Bechtel and he was one of the people paraded on TV (FOX) prior to this war to say why we needed to take out Saddam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Wonder why cable news never mentions when the mass graves...
...were dug. I bet they have half of America thinking this was all going on while Clinton was president. The Dems need to clarify who was letting this go on.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-16-03 10:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sickening.
If we were serious about stopping wmd's we would look no further than the mirror. Who stockpiles more weapons and spends more on them than everyone else on Earth combined? Who sells or gives them to todays allies despite their treatment of their citizens only to have them turned against them later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC