Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone with Nexis access who can check AWOL coverage in 2000?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 12:41 AM
Original message
Anyone with Nexis access who can check AWOL coverage in 2000?
Specifically, we want to know if the Wall Street Journal EVER mentioned George W. Bush's absence from his military duties at the Texas National Guard.

The WSJ's political reporter, Jeane Cummings, stated on Washington Journal Friday morning that the AWOL matter had been "covered" by the press in the presidential campaign of 2000.

It would be useful and sweet to check her own newspaper's coverage. I hope someone with Nexis access can do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TMorrow931 Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Anyone with Nexis access who can check AWOL coverage in 2000?"
I know this is off topic, but can anyone with Nexis find out who it was that said OBL and Al-Qeida was a "non-issue" during the Clinton Admin?

I kow I've seen it before, but I cannot find the news article. I'm pretty sure it was a Senator, but it could have been a Congressman.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. So I searched Nexis...
...and there's plenty of coverage of Bush's national guard service in various newspapers. The Boston Globe was the most aggressive, and here is an excerpt:

May 23, 2000 Boston Globe: "1-YEAR GAP IN BUSH'S GUARD DUTY NO RECORD OF AIRMAN AT DRILLS IN 1972-73"

The ease of Bush's entry into the Air Guard was widely reported last year. At a time when such billets were coveted and his father was a Houston congressman, Bush vaulted to the top of a waiting list of 500. Bush and his father have denied that he received any preferential treatment. But last year, Ben Barnes, who was speaker of the Texas House in 1968, said in a sworn deposition in a civil lawsuit that he called Guard officials seeking a Guard slot for Bush after a friend of Bush's father asked him to do so.

But Lloyd said it is possible that since Bush had his sights set on discharge and the unit was beginning to replace the F-102s, Bush's superiors told him he was not "in the flow chart. Maybe George Bush took that as a signal and said, 'Hell, I'm not going to bother going to drills.'


I tried a lot of different searches with the Wall Street Journal, and found only one article on August 2, "WAR HEROES: EVERYWHERE BUT THE TICKET" that simply mentions that neither Bush nor Cheney served in the military. The next week, on August 11, a letter was published responding to that article where the writer "insists Bush was probably in more danger every time he piloted Air National Guard jet than Gore was during his service in Vietnam."

So, my conclusions after a few minutes of research are that although it was covered in the press, the WSJ didn't make much mention of it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-20-03 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. thank you SOOO much
I think that's enough to spank her with. I'll challenge her to produce any other coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC