Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saddam: The monster we helped create

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:09 AM
Original message
Saddam: The monster we helped create
The monster we helped create By Robert Scheer
For the White House, a complete investigation into those who abetted Saddam's crimes against humanity would prove an embarrassing two-edged sword.

<snip>
That administration's eye was not on the carnage from chemical weapons but rather the profit to be obtained from the flow of oil. In a later meeting with an Iraqi representative, as recorded in the minutes, "Eagleburger explained that because of the participation of Bechtel in the Aqaba pipeline, the Secretary of State is keeping completely isolated from the issue. Iraq should understand that this does not imply a lack of high-level interest." (Shultz had been chief executive of Bechtel before joining the Reagan administration and is currently a director of the company, which is signing contracts for work in Iraq as fast as U.S. taxes can be allocated.)

Minutes of that meeting and others in which the United States ignored Saddam's use of banned weapons while extending support to the dictator mock the moral high ground assumed by George W. Bush in defense of his invasion. If, as Bush II says, Saddam acted as a "Hitler" while "gassing his own people," during the 1980s, we were fully aware and implicitly approving, via economic and military aid, of his most nefarious deeds.

Saddam's crimes were committed on our watch, when he was a U.S. ally, and we knowingly looked the other way.



more
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I've sprung this argument on Conservative Friends
And the response is usually something along the lines of "Well, aren't you happy we got rid of him? It sounds like all that information is just another reason to get rid of that vicious monster."

They have a bit of a leg up, because it's so easy to turn any discussion from "Well did Bush do the right thing in pulling us to war?" or "Did Bush lie to the American people?" or "Did the United States Prepare adaquetly for the post invasion phase?" to "Well, wasn't Saddam Hussein an evil man?"

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Easy response
"Aren't you pissed the same people you keep voting for put this maniac into power to begin with?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Osama's Tape: "The creation of and buddy of (Bush) America is gone"
Seems Osama is laughing at our US Media treating Saddam's capture as a war against terrorism event.

Osama does not realize how the US has right wing GOP controlled media!

:-)

By the way, after the usual 48 hours, the CIA is saying that they agree with the German's and everyone else that it is Osama on the Jan 1, 2004 tape.

Gee that makes it 100% - all Osama tapes have been not quite sure they are Osama so as to make the news stale - followed by the US agreeing that indeed it was Osama.

I wonder if Osama's put down of Saddam as a Creature of, creation of, friend of, the United States will ever make it into US Media.

What a silly thought!

:-)

:toast:

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who you callin' "we", kemosabe?
Besides, as I have stated for some time, if we were "at war with Iraq" since 1991, as *43 claims, then shouldn't Cheney be imprisoned for aiding and abetting the enemy clear up to (and including) 1998?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-05-04 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. a lot of fear about the truth of Saddam on both sides
Saddam was a product of Amertican foreign policy, not just Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC