Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone see Rumsfeld today...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
AG78 Donating Member (840 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 08:48 PM
Original message
Anyone see Rumsfeld today...
at the Pentagon briefing? I found the ending hilarious.

Just before the last question, the issue of the draft was brought up. Rumsfeld answered the question, but as usual, twisted the answer into a pretzel so it made no sense. But he was mentioning how he couldn't imagine the need for a draft(rather, just a bunch of incentives to get people to fight and die for other people's interests). Then I thought, but they told us they couldn't imagine planes being used as missles either.

Followed by the final question of the day. It was from a reporter that's been on c-span a few times, and her first name is Pam. I can't remember her last name, but you'd know her. Before Rumsfeld called on her, she prefaced her question that it was of vital interest to the American system. And then Rumsfeld took another question before she got to ask, but she did finally get to ask it. She asked Rumsfeld about why Saddam wasn't a POW, and what the US would gain or not gain from having Saddam be or not be designated with the title. The look on Rumsfeld's face was histerical. He wasn't sure what to say to the question. His initial response was that, "He's in good hands." She wouldn't accept that as an answer. Then Rumsfeld said he would need a lawyer to answer the question. He had nothing. It was great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. What? They bought him an Allstate insurance policy?
Edited on Tue Jan-06-04 08:59 PM by Mary Pat
Classic! Rumsfeld has shit for brains.



Edit: Welcome to DU, AG78! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe you're referring to Pam Hess
She's been asking very good questions lately. Maybe her trip to Baghdad cured her of her whoredom. A few more good questions and she'll be reporting on traffic tickets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. here's the transcript
looks like the Pentagon press corps was yukking it up with Rummy again. I can't stand it when they laugh at his stupid crap. :puke:

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2004/tr20040106-secdef1104.html

All right, Pam. You've got your pitiful look on your face.



Q: It's a good way to start the new year.



Rumsfeld: Yes.



Q: Thank you. Could you give us an update on the status --



Rumsfeld: Dick Myers is going to answer --



Q: -- he might help -- an update on the status of Saddam Hussein as a detainee and what the disadvantages are to giving him official prisoner of war status? And my suspicion is you're going to say something about lawyers are deciding this, but I have to think that the lawyers might have been thinking about this well before his capture. So if you could address that, please.



Rumsfeld: He is in good hands.



Q: I accept that. But legally, why is he not a prisoner of war? What's the disadvantage to the United States of giving him that status?



Rumsfeld: I'd have to get a lawyer to answer that for you. It's a technical reason.



Q: But haven't you been --



Rumsfeld: He's being treated under the -- with the privileges of the Geneva Convention.



Q: I'm thinking like Manuel Noriega, Manuel Noriega was a prisoner of war, and I'm trying to understand the difference.



Rumsfeld: Well, I'll take that under advisement. Do you want to answer that question, counselor?



Myers: No. (Laughter.) My degree is in engineering.



Rumsfeld: We'll tell you the difference between Noriega and -- yeah, between Noriega and Saddam Hussein's legal circumstance. But it's a mire, if I start getting in -- excuse the use of the word -- (Laughter.) -- it's a morass if I start getting into it.



Q: It's an important rule of law and fair play and -- (Inaudible.) -- of American character.



Rumsfeld: Of course it's important. Absolutely. Yeah. We'll get you a good answer.



Q: All right.



Rumsfeld: And you're going to like it.



Q: Sir, if -- (Off mike.) -- answer that one, can you -- (Off mike.)?



Rumsfeld: (Laughs.)



Q: (Off mike.)



Rumsfeld: Okay. You'll be hearing from the lawyers.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Military Brat Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Rummy: "All right, Pam, you've got your pitiful look on your face"
Gawd, I wish she had answered, "Yes, because it's so complementary to that condescending look on your face."

What sort of maggot-infested oatmeal inhabits that man's brains?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. saw his face....cringed....muted him and changed the station.
gin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm just giving this a kick
because after hearing Mike malloy's show
this was an important one .

He was asked about the stoploss orders and if
the draft was coming rummy said He didn't rule anything out .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's a tricky question for them because this either IS a war or IS NOT
a war depending on their needs. Certainly they don't want to grant Saddam any rights as a POW so my guess is it will not be a war, but when someone complains about that, then it will be wrong to complain during war. Rummy just hasn't received his GOP memo yet confirming which way the wind is blowing for the criminals in the Bush Regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuckeFushe Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-07-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Anyone see Rumsfeld today
Wasn't that HIM PICKING UP MY GARBAGE THIS MORNING?

"The President of the United States and the Secretary of Defense would not assert as plainly and bluntly as they have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction if it was not true, and if they did not have a solid basis for saying it,"

Ari Fleischer, December 2002
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC