Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mary Kay Letourneau: What does everyone think?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:59 AM
Original message
Mary Kay Letourneau: What does everyone think?
She served her time, her victim (now 21) wants to reunite with her, and yet there is a restraining order forbidding contact between the two.

They're both adults now - and if neither party wants the order, why can't it be abolished?

It's atrocious what she did, but everyone's grown up now, can't these adults choose to get on with their lives the way they want?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sure, they'll get together and I'll bet they are done in 6 months
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. My vote is that it will be less than that.
I can't fathom any type of relationship between those two when it ocurred. I can't understand how there could be one now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaTeacher Donating Member (983 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. yeah--whatever--it is hard to believe that
the kid hasn't moved on--I certainly didn't like the same kind of person at 22 that I did at 14. But--hey--if they are both consenting adults--doesn't bother me a bit. And of course no matter what they will have some contact because they have 2 children together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. what
if their sexes were reversed.

The girl now 21 wants to see her molester. Sounds very icky.

True, they are adults, but she still is his molester. If I had a say in it, which none of us really do, I would think they needed some counseling. Together and alone.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CO Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
45. ABSULUTELY CORRECT!!!!!
It's horrible that so many people have a "way to go, kid" attitude when it comes to this case.

She was in a position of authority, and used it to get what she wanted. She's a sexual predator - pure and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misinformed01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:02 AM
Original message
The young man can go to court and get the order
rescinded--this was addressed in the news stories yesterday.

This whole story is just so sad; I hope that all the people involved can somehow resolve all their issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smada Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. He's already asked to have the order rescinded
I saw a mention of it on the news last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misinformed01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well good--I hope they can work things out privately
I wish the press would leave them alone now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gryffindor_Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. If I were the judge....
I would order the boy evaluated. If a shrink said lifting the order was okay, then I would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. But he's not a "boy" any more. He's an adult, and should be able to
have contact with whomever he wishes. I don't see the need for any "evaluation".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gryffindor_Bookworm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. I should have clarified.
I survived childhood sexual assault, and it leaves permanent damage. The prohibition on contact's ostensible purpose is to protect him, the victim, from MORE damage. If he wants the prohibition lifted, and I were the judge, I would ask a shrink to verify that the reason for the prohibition in the first place -- his protection -- was no longer necessary.

This is not without precedent. Women (adults) who have received orders of protection against male partners (adults) and later want them lifted frequently have to undergo some sort of third-party assessment to verify that they're making the decision for reasons other than a death wish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Ah, I see.
I still don't agree with the evaluation, but I do see your point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, they are both adults
And they can do whatever they want now.

But what bothers me about the attitude of a lot of people (they are in love, its a real love story, etc.) is that this would never have been accepted if it had been a 34 year old man having sex with a 12 year old girl. Can you imagine? Its a double standard. An adult having sex with a 12 year old is sick in my opinion. I don't care who does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smada Donating Member (311 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. I agree
The way I think about it is this... would you be so easygoing about it if it was YOUR 12 year old son and his 34 year old teacher. I wouldn't. I'd want her in prison also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeacherCreature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. I'd want to kill her
but I wouldn't. I would still want her dead now.
I was molested as a child about the same age. You never stop paying the price for someone elses perversion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. You're right, and she went to prison for it.
Not only was she locked up, she was unable to raise her children, so the punishment was much harder than it would have been on a man (sorry guys, I know you love your kids, but mom is different in this case, a more intimate caretaker of infants and toddlers).

She's done her time, the judge and prison authorities don't think she's a danger to children, the kid is now and adult and wants contact with her. I don't see what the problem is at this point. There's no indication she's a pedophile. It seems to be a sexual attraction to one specific individual, instead of children in general.

I have a feeling that people have trouble with this now because the age difference is going the wrong way, that there would be no problem if it were a 40+ man and a 21 year old woman.

I intend to look the other way, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calico1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. So if it had been a 34 year old
man having sex with a 12 year old girl, you'd be fine with it too?
Of course if it had been a man he'd still be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. That was my point on another thread. But, he is 21 now
If he wants to see her, let him. I daresay their "love" will not survive long in the real world. Let's hope those two little girls somehow get a good upbringing in all this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. The woman who put the BOY in boyfriend
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't know enough about her victim's state of mind
His idea of what love is could be permanently warped by what she did. He may believe he has no chance with anyone more suitable. But without being able to read his mind I just don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dryan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Questions about her trial...
was their any evidence given about her background. Mary Kay's father was a member of Congress and also a John Birch member. He was later involved with a teenager. When it came time for re-election he was defeated but B-1 Bob!!! I'm sure that with that kind of publicity, you would be a little off kilter too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. John Schmitz also ran for president.
His wife was my father's aunt's sister-in-law.

Hence, Mary Kay is my cousin by marriage.

She stayed at my house when I was young (no, she did not try to sleep with me). She did, however, have a very fucked-up childhood; and is probably emotionally stunted at a junior-high-school level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. All the kid has to do is go to Court and ask that it be rescinded.
It's merely a formality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
14. They have children together and contact cannot be avoided
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
16. Guess Petersen, Kolby, Utah Jogger, Nancy Grace...
...isn't enough. Sheesh. Here comes another oldie but goodie.

FWIW...if she's served her time and had been paroled, and he's 21...that's double-legal (as we used to say), unless he requests a restraining order, I can't see a judge who can prohibit them from having some form of contact.

If she's been released as a sexual offender, and depending on the laws of Washington, I'm sure she could be prohibited from being near other "youngsters" and would be put on a neighborhood watch list...but once her parole is up...and she's kept her nose clean. It's time to move on. She's paid her debt.

Whether she and the "kid" stay together 2 months or 30 years, that now should be a strictly personal matter between two consenting adults.

- off soap box and thinking he's had too much coffee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
18. Entertainment for the masses while the world burns.
It's a big deal only because it's a woman and boy rather than the usual man and girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. I think they are adults now and the court has no defensible grounds
for keeping them apart. However, I do not think the children born to Letourneau while in jail should be returned to either one of them, but should stay with the boy's mother until such time intensive counseling and court-ordered assessment strongly supports their return.

I'd be willing to bet when the restrictions are removed from their relationship, that the "novelty" will quickly wear off. Sad case through and through...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
23. I feel so bad for that young man's mother
I'll bet this whole thing has driven her nuts over the past ten years or so that it's been going on. I understand her wanting to keep the children in the family, but I also feel bad for the kids-they may have been better off adopted by strangers.

Why do boys/men never think that it is sexual abuse for a grown woman to have sex with a preteen or teen boy? His poor mother has had to deal with this for all this time, trying to explain to him why the relationship was wrong, only to have him pick up with her when she gets out of jail. How frustrating for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. She's a pedophile...
... and he's not a pedo any more. This "relationship" has about as much chance of happening as an asteroid hitting the Earth tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #24
31. Villi was post-pubescent when she molested him.
Evidence? Their child.

Hence, she is NOT a pedophile (which is defined as someone who is sexually stimulated by pre-pubescent children).

She is a criminal, a child molester, and she went to prison (deservedly so) because of it. But one should use the proper terminology when discussing things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. While I wasn't going to wade into this cesspool
You are somewhat incorrect in your assessment. She began her relationship with the boy when he was 12, but did not become pregnant until he was 14. At least according to this ABC news article and all of the other news reports I have been assaulted with in the past few days due to this woman's release from prison.

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20040804_462.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Magrittes Pipe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. True.
It is possible that her particular pathology does indeed incorporate true pedophilia. That said, whatever one would diagnose, she is certainly a very disturbed woman.

To be clear, I wasn't trying to excuse anything she did. Mary Kay is sick. But she's also my cousin, so I feel the need to do whatever I can to... I dunno, I certainly don't wish to "shield" her -- for Christ's sake, she fucked a child. But she's still family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. I didn't think you were making excuses
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 05:32 PM by Susang
The situation is messed up for everyone involved and no matter what anyone here or on television may say, there are no easy answers. I feel horribly for all involved, even MK.

on edit: oh, and by cesspool, I meant this thread, not your post. For some reason subjects like this bring out the worst in DU. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
25. "No shark attacks? Guess we better run with THIS story today..."
"Gotta keep the heat offa Dubya, like Mr. Rove told us to..."

Heard in newsrooms all across the Frooted Plane...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edbermac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. I bet she'll be starring in a FOX reality show soon! Good titles, anyone?
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. I would just as soon not hear anything more about her. Enough.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
35. She should serve out her parole (if she has one) and then
she and the 21 yr old should move or whatever..I never want to hear about her again..

She committed a crime..she was convicted..she served the sentence..

Sounds like all involved here, have some serious psychological problems, but I am tired of hearing about it..

The children...all of them.. will be the ultimate losers in this whole sad thing..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. She's Just Misunderstood... It's True Love
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 12:52 PM by arwalden
He's more mature than his years. She's immature for her years. They meet somewhere close to the middle. It's a match made in heaven. The'll make the perfect couple and perfect parents. They did nothing wrong. It's our Puritanical society that punishes them for loving each other.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Are you joking around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
38. Even discussing this issue is engaging in the rankest misogyny
Or so one might led to believe in GD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Bull
You missed the point of that thread. That is not what Ripley, or anyone else in that thread was saying.

Please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Keep it in that thread, eh
Edited on Thu Aug-05-04 01:01 PM by JVS
But it is when people downthread say that the 1st response proves the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Follow your own advice
Why did you bring it up in this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. You are the one who mentioned the thread and named a person
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithlet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. It was what you were talking about
any one else participating in that thread would know what you were referencing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bookfreak Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
46. What she did was hideous....
...but she has done the alloted time in jail and the young man is now of consenting age. Therefore the law has no right to keep them apart should they wish to be together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-04 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
47. ain't nobody's business...
...what they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC