|
Edited on Tue Feb-28-06 09:44 AM by BlueIris
Sorry if this is a dupe--I checked and didn't see its equal, but mods can lock if they want.
Okay, a few off the top of my head:
"Lost in Translation." Not every critic in the world hated this movie and not all of my friends hated it, but there was a real polarity of opinion among the reviews I solicited from critics and peers. Some loved it and some think it's the stupidest, most ridiculous film they've ever wasted their time on. I like one of Ebert and Roper's explanations for the "either you love it or you hate it" reaction so many viewers have had to it--either you "get" what Coppola was trying to communicate there or you don't; you either understand that kind of painful social and personal isolation or you don't. Since I immediately "got" what she was doing and understand the lonely place those two characters are in, I think this film is incredible. I also love Japanese minimalism and think urban Japan is mesmerizing, so the cinematography and direction are wonderful in my eyes.
"Moonlight and Valentino." This charming movie contains an understated and moving story about grief, recovery and reconnection among four adult women that I always see written off as a "chick flick" by reviewers. Even my female friends say that. 'Kay, if you don't care about well-drawn characters, pitch-perfect pacing and a meaningful plot, yeah, sure. I guess.
"Magnolia." I realize that this may not count as a "they hated it and I revere it" film anymore than "Lost in Translation" does, but I think it is possibly the MOST underrated film of the '90s. I do not understand why it didn't wind up being an Oscar sweep and critically-acclaimed-forever-and-ever kind of movie. At all. It's one of the better film expositions on the idea that humanity can find personal and philosophical redemption and peace despite the oppressive influence of the so-called "sins of our fathers" both figurative and literal. Even in the Babylon of Los Angeles. Brilliant. I have this tendency to get violently angry whenever I encounter someone who says it was "boring," "stupid," "cryptic" or "not that special." Jesus.
"The Seduction of Joe Tynan." This movie actually has, in my humble opinion, Alan Alda's best performance in any film. It's completely great, as is the story--youngish American senator pursuing his unnamed party's nomination for president, and I guess I shouldn't give away the end, but let's just say he gets the nomination at the expense of his integrity. Fabulous, well-paced plot featuring equally terrific work by Meryl Streep that for some infuriating reason was only given three stars by Ebert back in the day and which no one remembers except me. And perhaps my mother, who thought it was "dull." ACK.
|