|
The names have been changed to protect the slackers. "Delicacies - a lunchtime chat" <2:18 PM> Sulu: ribbit! <2:39 PM> Checkov: got a frog in your keyboard? <2:49 PM> Sulu: not any more... i steamed and ate it! <3:06 PM> Chekov: steamed frog... mmm <3:07 PM> Chekov: hypothesis: any edible thing that one regards, in concept, as sufficiently repulsive is referred to by some other culture as a delicacy <3:07 PM> Sulu: hahahaha! probably... <3:08 PM> Sulu: of course, this requires a definition of "edible"... <3:08 PM> Chekov: corollary: if a food is not a delicacy, it is insufficiently repulsive <3:09 PM> Sulu: hmmm... i dunno about that one... <3:09 PM> Chekov: edible = that which can be eaten with little or no injury to the eater and has nonzero nutritional value <3:10 PM> Sulu: heh heh... sounds good to me... <3:11 PM> Chekov: I think the corollary would follow directly from the hypothesis... <3:12 PM> Sulu: aren't there many "delicacies" that aren't repulsive? <3:12 PM> Chekov: sure <3:12 PM> Chekov: but those are discarded by the premise of the corollary <3:12 PM> Sulu: :O <3:14 PM> Chekov: the corollary concerns only foods that are not delicacies <3:15 PM> Sulu: shhh! no more talk about food... i'm getting hungry again... <3:16 PM> Chekov: would you like some dung-fried maggots in pig bowel sauce? it's a delicacy <3:16 PM> Sulu: *sigh
|