Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tonight's Carolina-dook contest: more than just a game

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Vox_Reason Donating Member (589 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 07:39 PM
Original message
Tonight's Carolina-dook contest: more than just a game
Edited on Wed Feb-07-07 07:43 PM by Vox_Reason
If you don't care about college basketball, I still encourage you to read this post. Yes, the Carolina-Duke basketball games get a lot of national hype and publicity, but there's more to these contests than meets the eye.

Optional soundtrack--Hark the Sound of Tar Heel Voices:
http://www.lib.unc.edu/music/35%20Hark%20the%20Sound.mp3



Tonight will mark the 222nd renewal of the college basketball rivalry between the University of North Carolina Tar Heels and the Duke University Blue Devils. You might have heard about it on ESPN recently. In that network’s estimation, only Ali-Frazier and Michigan-Ohio State are bigger rivalries in all of sports, period.

For those of us in the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill "Triangle" area of North Carolina, these events are simply like no other. The proximity of the schools (8 miles apart) amplifies this national-scale rivalry to almost unbearable levels.

All over the region this week, events will take place before and during the game that will attract thousands of avid fans. The radio already crackles with the pre-game hype. Local TV stations are broadcasting from outside Cameron Indoor Stadium in Durham, interviewing Duke students who have been camping out in the cold for weeks for tickets to tonight's game. Carolina students will go to similar lengths to obtain tickets for the second game in Chapel Hill later this season.

Triangle residents will huddle around TVs in homes, restaurants, theaters, and anyplace that can get a TV signal to watch the game. Some will turn down the ESPN broadcast audio to instead listen to their favorite “homer” announcer call the game on their team’s radio network. The local ratings will be astronomical. Life will essentially shut down around here at 9:00 tonight. The rest of the world will simply fade into insignificance for a few hours, during which every moment will explode with nervous energy and excitement.

An article from the National Review Online last year (ugh--web cooties!) begins:

"I hate Duke basketball. And I hate Mike Krzyzewski.

This is not your garden-variety hatred, something you utter with the gravity of a helium balloon. This is a hatred pure of heart, uncorrupted by the sophistries of reason and reasonableness. Its taproot is deep within my soul, in a place where only those ancient bestial emotions lurk. Whenever I see Krzyzewski stomping up and down the Duke bench — face contorted in rage, twisted by arrogance, those glirine eyes darting obsessively to and fro as he gesticulates with a pomposity only he can muster — a red glaze comes over my vision, an animalistic rage wells from my primal id. I imagine myself endowed with psychic powers: If I concentrate hard enough perhaps he will falter, his team suffer some terrible reversal of fortunes, or, at the very least, that sneer will be wiped from his face for just a moment."

From his great book "To Hate Like This is to be Happy Forever" by Will Blythe, former editor of Esquire magazine:

"It is a basketball rivalry that simply has no equal. Duke vs. North Carolina is Ali vs. Frazier, the Giants vs. the Dodgers, the Red Sox vs. the Yankees. Hell, it's bigger than that. This is the Democrats vs. the Republicans, the Yankees vs. the Confederates, capitalism vs. communism. All right, okay, the Life Force vs. the Death Instinct, Eros vs. Thanatos. Is that big enough?"

For those who have never inquired “If God is not a Tar Heel fan, then why is the sky Carolina Blue?” and who have never witnessed the bristling and sneering that the question can provoke, let me inform you that this college basketball contest is about far more than what it appears on the surface. For dedicated partisans, it is about right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, and yes, liberals vs. conservatives.

I can only liken it to the experience of watching recent election night voting returns excluding last November for many DUers. I know that sounds hyperbolic, but I'm trying to convey the scope of the anxiety, the anticipation, and the pillow-rending, hair-curling, blood boiling excitement, and that's the best analogy I can provide for you, dear readers.

And indeed, if one would choose to view it in such a way, there is a rather striking political side to this rivalry. It is very stark and very clear. UNC stands loud, proud, and most unabashedly as the icon of liberalism in the Carolina-Duke rivalry.

The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill was America's first public university open to students, and the only one to graduate students in the 18th century. It is located in a community that is as blue as San Francisco in the middle of red state North Carolina.

The University of North Carolina was anticipated by a section of the first state constitution drawn up in 1776 directing the establishment of "one or more universities" in which "all useful learning shall be duly encouraged and promoted." State support, it directed, should be provided so that instruction might be available "at low prices." A modern example of how Carolina exemplifies its liberal roots is the Carolina Covenant program (http://www.unc.edu/carolinacovenant ), which provides a way for low-income students to graduate without debt.

As Charles Kuralt said at UNC’s 200th anniversary celebration:

“Mr. President; Mr. President; Mr. President; Governor Hunt, Chancellor Hardin, I speak for all of us who could not afford to go to Duke; and would not have even if we could have afforded it.

We are Tar Heels born and Tar Heels bred, and we are glad to be alive on the 200th anniversary of the establishment of public higher education in the New World, and immeasurably proud that this occurred October 12, 1793 here on the crest of New Hope Chapel Hill.

What is it that binds us to this place like no other? It is not the Well, or the Bell, or the stone walls, or the crisp October nights, or the memory of dogwoods blooming. Our loyalty is not only to William Richardson Davie, though we are proud of what he did 200 years ago today, nor even to Dean Smith, though we are proud of what he did last March. No, our love for this place is based on the fact that it is, as it was meant to be, the University of the People.”

Duke is a very expensive ($45,000 a year undergrad) private institution founded in 1924 on tobacco money with an overwhelmingly wealthy, out-of-state student population. Its alumni include Richard Nixon, while Carolina’s alumni include James Polk, our 11th president who was responsible for expanding America's borders to the shores of the Pacific.

Duke’s faux gothic frillery and disdainful, elitist student body who sneer at their middle-class counterparts at Carolina, as personified by the frequently very unsportsmanlike “Cameron Crazies”, might remind you of some of the qualities that we so admire about republicans.

Duke basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski held state fundraisers for Elizabeth Dole’s regrettably successful campaign for John Edwards’ vacating senate seat in North Carolina in 2004. When Krzyzewski is not playing all kinds of deceitful, manipulative games with referees during the basketball season, during the offseason he gives $40,000 keynotes about leadership and being a profane, arrogant prick.

The contrast between the coaches of both programs is indeed striking. From a University of Kentucky message board:

“Where Krzyzweski is patronizing and aloof, Carolina Coach Roy Williams is as plain as spilt cornflakes and as approachable as warm apple pie. Where Krzyzweski requires a thumbprint to take the elevator up to his office, you get the idea you could find Roy hanging out by the janitor’s closet swapping jokes with the cleaning crew. Where Krzyzweski bristles with military discipline and seems to carry the weight of the world on his shoulders, Williams’ self-deprecating sense of humor and plain old plainness make it seem as though he might not get offended if you dared ask him a question out of turn.

Most importantly, and what makes Roy so damned likable compared to Krzyzweski is that he isn’t a phony. He’s not trying to tell us he is a leader of men, not a coach, because he is a coach and he's clearly proud to be one. It is what it is and needs no embellishing. He didn’t hold a press conference when the Lakers asked him if he was interested in their head coaching position, but he could have. He doesn’t do any of the maddening things that are a trademark of the Krzyzweski regime.”

Before the affable, decent, and classy Roy Williams returned to the fold at Carolina, the coach that was his mentor on the UNC bench and who defined UNC basketball was Dean Smith.

Dean Smith comes from the root of the college basketball tree by way of Kansas, which was Roy Williams’ previous charge. Smith was a member of the Kansas teams that won the national championship in 1952 and finished second in 1953. Smith's coach at Kansas was the legendary Forrest "Phog" Allen, who had in turn learned the game from its inventor, James Naismith.

Dean Smith is one of the most significant liberals in North Carolina history. You can read the brief but excellent page on him at Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Smith) and see why he should be so venerated by liberals everywhere in America. An excerpt:

"Smith was also perhaps the most prominent liberal in his traditionally conservative state. In 1964, Smith joined a local pastor and a black UNC theology student to integrate The Pines, a Chapel Hill restaurant. He also played a large part in desegregating the city of Chapel Hill when he integrated the Tar Heels basketball team by recruiting Charlie Scott as the university's first black scholarship athlete.

"When I was named head coach the first call I got was from Bob Seymour, our pastor at the Binkley Church," Smith has said, speaking of a church noted for its inclusiveness. "Bob said now that you’ve been named head coach, you can resign as chairman of the student affairs committee, and your first church work will be to find a black basketball player."

He opposed the Vietnam War and, in the early 1980s, famously recorded radio spots to promote a freeze on nuclear weapons. He has been a prominent opponent of the death penalty. In 1998, he appeared at a clemency hearing for a death-row inmate and pointed at then-Governor Jim Hunt: "You're a murderer. And I'm a murderer. The death penalty makes us all murderers." He often took his players to visit death-row inmates.

While coach, he was recruited by some in the Democratic Party to run for the United States Senate against incumbent Jesse Helms. He declined. But in retirement, he has continued to speak out on issues such as the war in Iraq and gay rights."

A quote from Dean Smith:

“I just really believe that so much of anybody's ethical action is, `Do it for the least of these my brethren, do it unto me,"' Smith said. "For the unconditional love we receive from the Creator, we're supposed to respond with ethical action.”

Yes, Carolina-Duke is just another college basketball game, but for some, this game is so much more than that. Duke has beaten Carolina 16 of the last 20 times since the late 90s in very close contests. In the several years before that, Carolina won the majority of the clashes. Remind you of any other trends?

When Carolina won the 2nd meeting with Duke in 2005 on its way to a National Championship, it was the first opportunity I had since the nightmare in November 2004 to exult in the defeat of a hated rival. It allowed a torrential outpouring of so much of the frustration, anger, and misery in the wake of the bitterly disappointing and rather questionable 2004 election, and it was just exactly what I needed.

It all came out with such liberating ferocity that it somewhat freaked out my brother-in-law, who was watching the game with me—but it didn’t completely freak him out, because he grew up here and he understands what the Duke-Carolina games mean to folks around here. For Christmas 2005, my brother-in-law gave me the Art Chansky book about the rivalry as a nice symbolic acknowledgement of what that moment meant to me, which is saying a lot, since we don’t agree at all on politics.

He understands that for the people of the Triangle, the epic battles between the Tar Heels and the Blue Devils, which occur at least twice a year and sometimes (and most excruciatingly) more than that, are some of the biggest local events of the year. Even people with no interest in sports can’t avoid being aware of it.

What if Alabama and Auburn or Michigan and Ohio State were 8 miles apart? For the people that lived in the area, the only annual football game between them would probably create a distortion of the space-time continuum.

Tonight, I’ll be “going where I go and doing what I do”, in the words of 30+ year Tar Heel broadcaster Woody Durham, and hanging on his every word as my beloved Tar Heels enter another epic, valiant struggle against the evil empire.

I hope you will join me this evening in cheering on the boys in Carolina blue, who represent as fine and admirable an embodiment of personal and institutional liberal excellence as there exists in our great country.

GO HEELS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Billy Ruffian Donating Member (672 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-07-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Go HEELS!
My son is at UNC, and if you cut him, he'd bleed Carolina Blue.

One (very, very minor) possible disagreement. Mind you, I'm not at all certain, and don't feel like looking it up, and a couple of Trader Joe's Hofbrau Bocks could be clouding my memory.

You wrote: Duke basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski held state fundraisers for Elizabeth Dole’s regrettably successful campaign for John Edwards’ vacating senate seat in North Carolina in 2004. When Krzyzewski is not playing all kinds of deceitful, manipulative games with referees during the basketball season, during the offseason he gives $40,000 keynotes about leadership and being a profane, arrogant prick.


I am not certain, but I think it was Richard Burr, not Elizabeth Dole, that took John Edwards' seat. In someways, that might be OK, since Erskine Bowles was able to become the HMFIC for the UNC system. (kidding!..it's good that Bowles is head of UNC, but we could have found someone good, and he would have been the better senator)

Signing off with 65 minutes until game time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC