Hi. I'm a baby boomer here, one in the latter half of the boom (i.e., I'm not looking at retirement, I'm looking at 20 more years of full-time employment, God willing).
I've been looking at news stories on the intergenerational workplace for only a couple of months now, but I find it's a topic of heated discussion all over the English-speaking world. What got me started was Lisa Belkin's July 26th New York Times article called "When Geezers and Whippersnappers Collide." Don't take umbrage at the title; the article isn't a vilification of one generation or another, but rather a brief discussion of the sometimes clashing expectations and practices of today's diverse workforce.
I was pleased to discover Belkin's article is still available online without cost. See the link below.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/26/fashion/26work.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&pagewanted=all&oref=sloginWhile I hesitate to make too many generalizations about one age group or another, finding the article was a comfort to me because it showed others were going through the same dynamics I've run into in my office.
It's not necessarily a pretty picture. I'll cite just one particular co-worker (a member of Gen Y, as it happens). We rely on teamwork to get the job done in my department, and this young woman possesses one or two skills that are valuable to the group. The trouble is that there are several crucial areas where she is very weak, sometimes disastrously so. Some of this we can chalk up to her lack of experience, plus a tendency to rush through things and ignore detail (on a detail-oriented job, I might add).
But she makes it patently obvious that coming to work is a tremendous favor she is conferring on our sorry asses, that she is entitled to as much time off as she wants and as often as she wants, and by the way, despite her junior status, the plum vacation days at major holidays are hers, hers! She's half my age and calls in sick -- sometimes "sick," nudge, nudge, wink, wink -- more frequently than anyone on the staff.
A Gen X friend of mine ran into similar problems when he was in management, and it wasn't that these staffers were pursuing some idealistic work-life balance, either. They were unclear on the concepts to begin with.
That said, I wouldn't tar any generation with the same brush. I know Gen Y members who possess tremendous sweetness and maturity and idealism, and furthermore, I could get into a lengthy discussion about cynicism, self-absorption, indifference, and other fun traits I have observed in members of the other generations in my 30-plus years of employment.
I would submit, however, that at least in the U.S. we are undergoing some marked societal shifts, and it's creating tensions in the workplace -- tensions that don't serve anyone well, including Generation Y. It's not just technology or dress codes or work-life balance; it's how we treat each other.
On edit: Don't be in too much of a hurry to declare that boomers have a "chokehold on power" or hold all the resources. Gen Y is too young to be president (You've got to be 35), and heads of state in their 40s are the exception and not the rule. So we may have a Gen X president in the not too distant future, but expect the normal wait. Thus far we've only had two boomer presidents, both born at the beginning of the boom and not the end.
I haven't done a demographic anaylsis of Congress but would note that it's better to evaluate members according to their political stances and not their ages. Representative Patrick McHenry (R-NC), born at the end of Generation X, would be anathema to DUers. Korean War vet Charlie Rangel (D-NY) is younger than the Greatest Generation and older than the boomers, but politically he's more my speed!
Eat a big bowl of Resentment Flakes for breakfast every morning and you'll turn into the left-wing variation on Clarence Thomas. You wouldn't want that to happen, would you?