Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Georgia Court Orders Man Freed in Sex Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:17 PM
Original message
Georgia Court Orders Man Freed in Sex Case
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/26/us/26cnd-georgia.html?em&ex=1193544000&en=5338ce085ff64b09&ei=5087%0A

By BRENDA GOODMAN
Published: October 26, 2007

ATLANTA, Oct. 26 — The Georgia Supreme Court today ended the 10-year prison sentence of a man who was convicted in 2003 of having consensual oral sex with another teenager. The court said the harsh sentence violated the Constitution’s protection against cruel and unusual punishment.

In a 4-to-3 ruling, the court’s majority said the sentence was “grossly disproportionate” to the crime, which the justices said “did not rise to the level of culpability of adults who prey on children.”

The inmate, Genarlow Wilson, who is now 21, was 17 when he was caught on videotape having oral sex with a 15-year-old girl at a drug- and alcohol-fueled New Year’s Eve party in 2003. He is expected to be released this afternoon.

Mr. Wilson was convicted of aggravated child molestation for the act, a charge which carried a mandatory minimum prison term so harsh it shocked his jury and prompted an international outcry from critics who charged that prosecutors had been overzealous and racially motivated. The law, critics said, was meant to keep child molesters behind bars, not to curb teenage sexual activity.

The year after Mr. Wilson was sentenced, the Georgia General Assembly changed the law to make consensual sex between teens a misdemeanor punishable by no more than a year in prison; but the legislature declined to apply the law to Mr. Wilson’s case retroactively. That decision set up a test of wills between the lawmakers and judges, as Mr. Wilson’s attorney appealed to both camps to set free her client, who had been an honors student and star athlete.

Writing for the majority in Friday’s 48-page opinion, Chief Justice Leah Ward Sears noted that changes to the law made after Mr. Wilson’s conviction “represent a seismic shift in the legislature’s view of the gravity of oral sex between two willing teenage participants.

“The severe felony punishment and sex offender registration imposed on Wilson make no measurable contribution to acceptable goals of punishment,” she wrote.

But dissenting judges said the legislature had clearly not intended to make the new law retroactive to Mr. Wilson’s case.

As a result, wrote Justice George Carley in dissenting opinion, the punishment should not be deemed cruel and unusual. He said the majority decision represented an “unprecedented disregard for the General Assembly’s constitutional authority” and wrote that it would open the door for other felony offenders convicted of aggravated child molestation to be “discharged from lawful custody.”

Attorney General Thurbert E. Baker, in a written statement, indicated that he would not challenge the high court’s decision.

“I respectfully acknowledge the court’s authority to grant the relief that they have crafted in this case,” Mr. Baker said. “I hope the court’s decision will also put an end to this issue as a matter of contention in the hearts and minds of concerned Georgians and others across the county who have taken such a strong interest in this case.”

John Lewis, a Democratic congressman from Georgia, called the case “one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in Georgia in modern times.”

“Each day this young man spent in jail is one day too long,” Mr. Lewis said in a statement. “It was unbelievable for this young man to go through what he went through.”

Mr. Wilson has spent more than two years behind bars, and was expected to be released from the Al Burrus Correction Training Center in Forsyth.

“The courts can work; the courts do work,” said Brenda J. Bernstein, Mr. Wilson’s lawyer in telephone interview.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. 10 years for getting a BJ from a girl two years younger than you.
Wow.

Glad to see it overturned. Not nearly as glad as Mr. Wilson I bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Most states have a "close in age" exemption
Mine does.

I wonder if he has to register as a sex offender.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Still, 10 years is a lot of time?
I mean, 10 years ago I was in elementary school!

That's insane and time he can't have back. Now he's an adult, with no job and a big wall to climb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ga. limps into the late 1900's...
still behind, but they're trying...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Isn't GA one of the states where...
It's illegal to buy a vibrator?

I know there are a bunch of them in the south - Texas and Alabama stick out in my mind - but I'm not sure which ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I wouldn't be surprised.
There's a lot of that shit down here in the beautiful backward South. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yep
http://www.chron.org/tools/viewart.php?artid=1229

For example, it is illegal to buy a vibrator (unless it's for medical purposes) in Georgia, Texas, Alabama, Mississippi, Indiana, Virginia, Louisiana and Massachusetts, where selling a dildo can get you up to five years in jail. This past February the Supreme Court declined to review the constitutionality of the Alabama law, leaving lonely southern women a bit lonelier.

Massachusetts???

Medical purposes? What does a vibrator prescription look like?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lightningandsnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You could say...
You're using it to massage your neck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. bullshit
there's plenty of sex stores here, and they definitely sell vibrators
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. More like dragged kicking and screaming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, it's about time. recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-26-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. thank goodness
this whole case has been a sham of justice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC