Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dr. Phil investigated by psychology board (Psychologist filed complaint as result of Britney mess)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:39 PM
Original message
Dr. Phil investigated by psychology board (Psychologist filed complaint as result of Britney mess)
Dr. Phil is the target of a complaint filed with the California Board of Psychology. When Dr. Phil attempted to counsel Britney he was technically practicing without a license which is a felony, according to TMZ:

We've learned the person who filed the complaint is a psychologist. Dr. Phil has never been licensed to practice in California, and he retired his Texas license in 2006.
The psychologist who filed the complaint also alleges Dr. Phil violated HIPAA laws by "discussing or divulging a patient's medical condition ... with the media," in reference to a press release issued by Dr. Phil.


The psychologist is also passing around a petition to others in the field to have Dr. Phil removed from the air. So some good actually came of this whole debacle. At this point, I pretty much expected Satan to rise up from the earth and play guitar in front of Britney’s house. Dammit. Now I have to wait until she gets pregnant.

http://thesuperficial.com/2008/01/dr_phil_investigated_by_psycho.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's about bloody time!
The man is a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good! nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oprah will not be pleased
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oprah is not my moral compass...
...and I FEEL SO GOOD for saying that.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. You misunderstand
I meant Oprah will not be pleased with the complainant, the California Board of Psychology and probably TMZ, and will destroy them.

:scared:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Actually, I think she's pretty phed up with Phil, too.
And, if she's not, she should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You think she'll phuck him over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. She'll phlip him the bird by phiring him really phast!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Great!
this is good news to me

unlicensed TV shrinks shouldn't be allowed to deal with people with real problems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Next on the list: Cedars-Sinai...
...there were many questions raised as to why he was allowed access to her, and all of the questions remain unanswered. They should also be held accountable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. absolutely
unless she requested him to come

he had no right

HIPPA was violated

big fines

lawsuits

OOPS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. It's very simple.
Dr. Phil is a celebrity and celebrities can do whatever they like. It's probably a felony in California for someone to impede a celebrity in the execution of their famousness.

Don't you know that celebrity confers super powers and additional rights not mentioned in the Constitution? A SWAT team would have leveled Cedars-Sinai if they'd dared to stand in Dr. Phil's divinely-anointed way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. No shit.
Phil and his enablers need to be stopped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. If "Dr" Phil's mix of schadenfreude and slogans counts as practicing...
...I don't think the Board really wants to draw attention to that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. I hope the penalty for that in California is being shot in the head by Jimmy Carter on live TV
during American Idol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. Dr. Phil is a demon set loose on the earth to lower the standards.
It's good that the fat fuck is finally being taken down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Psychologist?
Come on! He's an entertainer. So is she. This is just good publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. Very good news.

He was way over the (confidentiality) line IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatchling Donating Member (968 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hell, yes!
The man is a danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
16. so this is the kind of celebrity crapola i like, i cannot stand Dr. Phil and just sent
this to my Dr. Phil loving friend, i've been waiting for a very long time for this. thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. This is the best news I've heard since Glen Beck's hemorrhoidectomy!
Dr. Phil is a charlatan and a disgrace.
Jerry Springer on steroids.
Sigmund Freud meets Gomer Pyle.

And, speaking of piles - how IS Glen Beck doing?:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep North Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dr. Philgood...
is in the dictionary...

quack - an untrained person who pretends to be a physician and who dispenses medical advice
doc, doctor, physician, Dr., MD, medico - a licensed medical practitioner;
charlatan, mountebank - a flamboyant deceiver; one who attracts customers with tricks or jokes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkTirade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. ....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. Where is the proof of his...
"discussing or divulging a patient's medical condition ... with the media," ?

Does he have her medical records, or did he speculate and get attacked for "counseling" her?

Which is not against the law, BTW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC