Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ok...Why no Beatles songs on ITunes? Seriously!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:48 PM
Original message
Ok...Why no Beatles songs on ITunes? Seriously!
And no, not covers...Should I blame Michael Jackson? :wtf:

First the Smiths, and now this. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. You need a little 'Hey Bulldog' don't you?
I heard somewhere that's it's some kind of licensing deal.

And yes, blame Michael Jackson, even though I'm pretty sure he has nothing to do with it. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vixengrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. We could get lucky, yet--
http://www.macnn.com/articles/07/06/01/beatles.itunes.in.08/



Here's hoping. My Beatles are on vinyl, which is not especially amenable to "ripping." But then again:

http://money.cnn.com/2006/11/22/technology/apple_beatles_ipod.fortune/index.htm

We've been told this before.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Michael Jackson has very little say-so about that
It's a complicated process, but publisher's ownerships to songs in different than the rights to the songs and albums. And Sony is 50% owner of publishing rights also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's always safe to blame Michael Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-26-08 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ha! You've been looking for the same artists that I have!!
Man, I would LOVE to have the Beatles' catalog on iTunes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Should be there shortly
They finally signed a contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. Didn't part of it have to do with...
Some sort of trademark infringement dispute between Apple Records and Apple, Inc that dates back to the 70s or 80s? IIRC, was some agreement between the two companies that Apple, Inc promised that they would not get into the music business in exchange for Apple Records not making a big stink over trademark infringement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-27-08 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. A few reasons
1. Lots and lots of red tape

2. They're remastering their catalog, which hasn't been done since the '80s. That's why the CDs currently available sound so mediocre. Compare their original releases to the sound quality of later compilations like "1" and "Love." And their early stuff is still available only in mono. I can't wait to hear how the stuff will sound remastered.

3. The Beatles are known to take their time with this stuff. It took forever for their music to come out on CD (1987). They're perfectionists, and it is probably unlikely that former producer George Martin will be able to help remaster their music, since he's in his early 80s, hard of hearing and basically retired. His son did much of the mixing on "Love," and did an amazing job. "Love" sounds absolutely stunning! Perhaps they should bring him in to do the job.

4. Four separate camps (Paul, Ringo, and the two widows) have to sign off on it. Sounds like they're all in agreement and want to put the music on iTunes.

5. The whole Apple vs. Apple lawsuit thingy (Initially, per their agreement with Apple Corps., Apple Computer would be prohibited from entering the music business).

6. The publishing rights to almost all of thier music are owned 50/50 by Michael Jackson and Sony/ATV, though I doubt there's too much of an issue there. Lots of cover versions are available on iTunes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC