Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There Will Be Blood was robbed.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:39 AM
Original message
There Will Be Blood was robbed.
I know, I know: welcome to 2 months ago.

I finally got a chance to watch the movie last night. I liked No Country For Old Men well enough, but I think TWBB was superior in just about every way. Acting, cinematography, writing, direction. I didn't have high expectations of Mr. Anderson, but I think his film is going to hold up much better over the long run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Question...
What the hell is that "I will drink your milkshake!" saying, signify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "I pwn your ass."
'DRRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAINAGGE!!!!!"

*spoliers*

What was the point of killing him with a bowling pin, though? And this is what I don't get about people saying Plainview wasn't a villain . . . uh, he committed murder twice out of sheer petulence and was a general piece of shit to the kid he raised? VILLAIN!

*end of spoilers*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Metaphorically speaking..
"pwn3d", like Hugh said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catsbrains Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. I thought it should have been called...
There Will Be Boredom.

Explain yourself girl gone mad. I want to know what I was missing. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Lol...
I thought the Oscar winner should have been called "No Country For Old Bores", so I guess I can relate.

The theme of conflict between religion and capitalism (with religion being forced into submission) worked for me and seems an appropriate allegory for our times. Also, I enjoyed the fact that it was such a twisted rags-to-riches story that treated excessive greed as the pathology that it is. How often does Hollywood admit that money doesn't make everything better, having it doesn't make you a good person and the pursuit of success can drive you down a path of personal destruction?

In my opinion, Daniel Day Lewis gave the performance of the decade. His final few scenes were perfection. Miles above what any of his peers have turned in lately. He had some great, memorable lines and he delivered them with absolute precision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catsbrains Donating Member (352 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Okay...you convinced me.
I'll watch it again in your eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not really, it got what it deserved, which wasn't much
It was a very stale film, I found myself unable to care about any of the characters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. I disagree in entirety
Edited on Mon Apr-21-08 07:30 AM by EstimatedProphet
I thought it was a very good movie, but not as good as No Country For Old Men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. NCFOM..
was a bore to me. I thought even Sweeney Todd was much better.

The nonsensical weapons, gimmicky haircut, boring opening narration and final scene w/ Tommy Lee Jones all added up to a film that felt weak and fake. I thought the Terminator had more depth than Javier Bardem's villain. Woody Harrelson was funny but his character served next to no purpose. Two central characters were ingloriously disposed of off screen. I guess it wasn't so much bad as just a mostly forgettable film going experience for me.

The funny thing is that I love most of the Coen brothers' films and I hated both of the Paul Thomas Anderson films I'd previously seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I still disagree
Guess we'll have to agree on this :)

Also, I liked Sweeney Todd.

I just thought the revelations about Lewis' character in There Will Be Blood were a little flat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC