If you were king/queen of the world, what previously verboten thing would you allow?

[Tommy_Carcetti]

For me, it would be use of the word "irregardless"--it has a very nice flow to it, much, much better than "regardless" or "irrespective"--and dividing by zero. Want to divide by zero? I say go to town.

[SOteric]

1. I would allow any females who wished to go topless.

I do suspect, however, that the sight of so many boobies hanging down to a person's belly button would end the male fascination with big garbanzos once and for all.

[redqueen]

5. I like this idea.

It's a win-win. Guys get to see boobies more often, so they'd be happier... and young women would get to see REAL boobies more often, so they'd be less stressed about their non-perfect ones.

[Dr. Strange]

11. ALLOW? Hell, I'd mandate it!

Or womandate it. Or whatever the appropriate term is.

[Rambis]

2. I would put to death

anyone using "irregardless":evilgrin:

[redqueen]

3. ...

:thumbsup:

Might as well accept "nukeyooler" :puke:

[Tommy_Carcetti]

4. Irregardless of you're position on the matter, for all intensive purposes I will continue to use it.

All of the sudden, that became very clear to me.

[Rambis]

6. AHHHHHHHH! (bang!)

:hi:

[Forkboy]

7. Cannabilism

Fuck it, let's go all out!!!!!! No mamby pamby "irregardless" stuff. Think big!!! :)

[Tommy_Carcetti]

8. Isn't that alreadly legal in California?

I read something about that being the case....:popcorn:

[Forkboy]

9. There's no telling with those wacky left coasters.

:)

[Symarip]

10. It's called 'population control'

At least CA is taking an active role instead of sitting in the back seat waiting for other states to eat them.