|
of course, she could not charge for anything but a level 1 visit, but on the other hand, she's fighting to stay afloat too. Insurance companies, especially HMO's cut and contract and make the reimbursement pretty bad for physicians doing office visits. No wonder procedures are popular, even for family practitioners. More reimbursement. Office staffs have grown to meet the demands of insurance companies and Medicare included. HMO's for Medicare aren't saving Medicare any money, they are just making money off Medicare. Why not give all but 20% of what they save back to Medicare? :rofl: like that is going to happen. Medicare reimbursement is not so good either for lots of things.
In my state though, Medicaid pays like $10 for an ER visit? Yet there are companies that have set up and are making a killing doing day treatment with children and adolescents, and school based treatment. Good to treat the kids, but the reimbursement rate is what amazes me.
Where I work we get a daily rate from Medicare per person in the hospital (psych) We have to staff, provide the care, pay for everything then the rest is "profit" (a not for profit hospital can't really make a profit) We make our budget. We work short staffed because the reimbursement is not enough to pay for the staff you need. Each day a person is there the rate goes down. Acuity is taken into consideration only in the form of outliers like other diagnoses. The biggest reimbursement we get is the first day if they come through the ED. Now there are coders who are experts at reading through reports and paperwork to bill for everything that gets mentioned and get every penny from Medicare.
I asked a Medicare biller once in the past about our reimbursement rate, he said "I don't know" he said they just turned it all over to Medicare. Fox guarding the henhouse.
I digress and got way off track
okay yes we should be screaming for better insurance. I believe it is not only possible but would be cost saving and better than what we have if we paid taxes for our insurance instead of premiums. If everyone were covered, there would have to be limits and "rationing" (which we already have in the form of prior authorization and denial of coverage, and decisions made by third parties about what the treatment should be for a person)
I'm for a straight up not for profit one size fits all government run company. I know, flame away. Or not.
|