Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Resme question....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:44 AM
Original message
Resme question....

I am re-working my resume, buffing it up and hoping to make some strides.
I am curently working, and this is the 2nd position doing the exact same job, just for a different company.
Is it bad form to have my current position duties listed as same as below or the former position with the skills listed, same as above?
There really isn't a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Make it so there's a difference - even if similar....
"Currently doing x for a $__ company. Duties also include y and z and w."

"Did x for a $__ company in the ________ industry. Duties also included y and z."



In any event I'd advise against 'same as above' or 'same as below'. To me that doesn't convey the sense of attention to effort and detail that you want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks, that;s kind of what I thought as well
And I don't want to come across as lazy either.
As for the $$, I'd rather not convey that because the places I am applying for pay much greater than my current and former job, so I feel like if I let that out, they will see an opporunity to low ball me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Oh I agree - I meant the $$ to describe the size of the company you work(ed) for
My resume describes the company as well, just to give the reader a sense of the organization I work(ed) for: "A $xx million transportation and logistics company" or "A specialty consulting firm with $xx in annual billings"

I agree - keep your salary as close to the vest as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. oh ok...that's what I thought...
thanks for the clarification nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another question..this time references
Some of the samples I am looking at say "references upon request"
Should I keep with that, or give them a few? Obviously the ones I will give them will have nothing but good things to say about me,hell even the ones they can find without me knowing will say good things about me(didn't mean this to sound arrogant I just always get good yearly reviews, and people tend to compliment working with me)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It's customary to say 'upon request'
Keeps the resume down to the one-or-two page document it's supposed to be. I'd leave it at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Fair enough....
I'm just not a toot my own horn kind of person, so I like to rely on others to speak for me in that regard. Having said that, there's always room for growth, and I wil do some tooting with the cover letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Don't bother with the references part.
When they want them, they will ask for them. It is assumed you will provide them upon request. Use that space for more pertinent information, even if it's something like volunteer work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Better idea.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Another question...this time the cover letter
Edited on Sun Apr-10-11 12:06 PM by Tripper11
Not how to write it, I have a good idea about that.
But, I will be submitting my resume and cover letter to the company's website where I have created a profile with my job search criteria.
I just need to what salutation to use "To whom it may concern" "Attn: Human Resources Dept." ??

Thanks again Richardo or anyone else who contributes...I appreciate it.

*edited for spelling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. WORST resume I ever got - huge graphic of a terminal at the top...
I forget all of the humorous details, but it ended with, "I know CRT and database".

CRT? Okay, so she worked on a cathode ray tube terminal.

Database? Um, which one? I'm sure that just meant the proprietary software that fed what she typed INTO the database.

Damn was that a bad resume. I can't think of a worse one, and I've received far too many to remember.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I can somewhat relate to the sender of that bad resume. Although I have never had
a problem learning or using proprietary software, I am fairly dense when it comes to computer jargon and therefore only state that I am proficient in MS Office. How would you have interpreted such a meagre description?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. In answer to your first question:
Depending on circumstances, you may want to consider creating a functional or combined resume instead of a chronological resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. spell check?
"resme":P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yeah I just noticed that!
But spell check will be run for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tripper11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Should I include my "Objective" at the top of my reusme?
My wife says she heard, that's not the new style.
I am including a cover letter as well.
So Yes Objective, or No Objective?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I say no objective...
...another boilerplate space-waster, doesn't contribute any real content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
17. Depends on your interviewer. I like one page. Same shit-different place works for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. You could use words like "building on my experience at X, I learnt Y".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC