|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
kedrys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-12-11 09:00 PM Original message |
Theoretically, if one person hasn't worked in 5 years and spends every dime the other person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Generic Brad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-12-11 09:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. If they are not theoretically married or living together - sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kedrys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-12-11 09:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. They are theoretically married |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nolabear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-12-11 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. If the other person in this theoretical marriage doesn't want to be married |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 12:09 AM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Perfect answer. This theoretical marriage doesn't sound as strong as a paperdoll chain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Incitatus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-12-11 09:37 PM Response to Original message |
4. If this purchase is a home this couple will live in, the other person's input should be considered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-12-11 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
5. Hypothetically, I'd think that de-imagining the theoretical marriage would best be done |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SOteric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-12-11 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
6. Assuming that the theoretical spendthrift isn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recovered Repug (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 07:08 AM Response to Original message |
8. If every dime brought in is spent, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 07:20 AM Response to Original message |
9. Theoretically, if the theoretical marriage is theoretically shaky |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orrex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 07:38 AM Response to Original message |
10. This is like that riddle about the fox, the duck, and the sack of grain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blueamy66 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 07:44 AM Response to Original message |
11. No lines in the play. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
12. If it's a married couple, the insistance by one for the other... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
raccoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
13. Are you Canadian? If you're male, and are going to be single in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 09:06 AM Response to Original message |
14. Did the person "not working" actually cook, clean, manage the household, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MorningGlow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 09:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. My thought exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kedrys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 05:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Cook and clean, yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
16. Theoretically... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
17. therapy, not real estate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moondog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
18. Sounds like it is time for you to move on. Theoretically. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bunny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
19. If I'm recalling this correctly, there have been issues in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kedrys (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 05:30 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. There are other factors at work |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tuesday Afternoon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 05:48 PM Response to Original message |
22. sorry, but - theoretically, yes. The pattern has been established. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
YellowRubberDuckie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-13-11 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
23. Is the other person running the household? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC