Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

100 years of re-alignment...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
burr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 08:15 PM
Original message
100 years of re-alignment...
In 1896, a textbook election for all students of politics, William Jennings Bryan won a solid south, and almost all the western prairie and mountain states. McKinley won all but one of the Pacific states, the east coast states from Maine to Maryland, the Great Lakes states, along with Iowa, North Dakota, Kentucky, Vermont, and West Virginia. The Republicans stood for industry, tariffs, business, fiscal discipline, the gold standard, and helping the cities. It goes without saying...there were no suburbs at the time. Democrats opposed tariffs, were against the gold standard, sought to help rural America, saw the nation's future in small towns.

<http://www.presidentelect.org/e1896.html>

Fast foward to the Presidential election in 2000, which is bound to become another textbook example. Shrub won the solid south, along with almost all of the western prairie and mountain states. Gore one all but one of the Pacific states, all but one of the east coast states from Maine to Maryland, all but two of the Great Lakes states, along with Iowa, New Mexico, and Vermont. Democrats were split on trade, supported aid to struggling industry, supported fiscal discipline, supported tax credits for to startup business, wanted to find ways to help mass transportation, and bring aid to the inner cities. Republicans opposed tarriffs, supported massive tax cuts, campaigned on "no child left behind" in the suburbs, and saw the country's future in trailer parks. :thumbsdown:

<http://www.presidentelect.org/e2000.html>

This reminds me a little of square dancing, but what caused it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. time to cut the confederacy loose? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-03-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They already cut loose...
Edited on Sun Aug-03-03 09:05 PM by burr
it's time for others to see this, and to work on winning other states. Had Gore spent all his time trying to win the McKinley states, he would be President today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC