Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT, pg1: Obama in the Senate: Star Power, Minor Role

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:18 AM
Original message
NYT, pg1: Obama in the Senate: Star Power, Minor Role
The Long Run
A Measured Start
This is part of a series of articles about the life and careers of contenders for the 2008 Republican and Democratic presidential nominations.

Obama in Senate: Star Power, Minor Role
By KATE ZERNIKE and JEFF ZELENY
Published: March 9, 2008

Senator Barack Obama stood before Washington’s elite at the spring dinner of the storied Gridiron Club. In self-parody, he ticked off his accomplishments, little more than a year after arriving in town. “I’ve been very blessed,” Mr. Obama told the crowd assembled in March 2006. “Keynote speaker at the Democratic convention. The cover of Newsweek. My book made the best-seller list. I just won a Grammy for reading it on tape. “Really, what else is there to do?” he said, his smile now broad. “Well, I guess I could pass a law or something.”

They were the two competing elements in Mr. Obama’s time in the Senate: his megawatt celebrity and the realities of the job he was elected to do. He went to the Senate intent on learning the ways of the institution, telling reporters he would be “looking for the washroom and trying to figure out how the phones work.” But frustrated by his lack of influence and what he called the “glacial pace,” he soon opted to exploit his star power. He was running for president even as he was still getting lost in the Capitol’s corridors.

Outside Washington, Mr. Obama was a multimedia sensation — people offered free tickets to his book readings for $125 on eBay and contributed thousands of dollars each to his political action committee to watch him on stage questioning policy experts. But inside the Senate, Mr. Obama, the junior senator from Illinois, was 99th in seniority and in the minority party his first two years. In committee hearings, he had to wait his turn until every other senator had asked questions. He once telephoned reporters himself to draw attention to his amendments. And some senior colleagues were cool to the newcomer, whom they considered naïve.

Determined to be viewed as substantive, Mr. Obama kept his head down, declining Sunday talk show invitations for his first year, and consulted Senate elders for advice. He was cautious — even on the Iraq war, which he had opposed as a Senate candidate. He voted against the withdrawal of troops and proposed legislation calling for a drawdown only after he was running for president and polls showed voters favoring it. And while he rightly takes credit for steering through an ethics overhaul that reformers called a “gold standard,” like most freshmen he did not play a significant role in passing much other legislation and disappointed some Democrats for not becoming a more prominent voice in other important debates.

Yet Mr. Obama was planning for the future. He spent much of his time raising money for other Democrats, which helped him build chits and lists of potential voters. He tended to his image, even upbraiding a reporter for writing that he had smoked a cigarette (a habit he later said he gave up for his presidential bid).

Early on in his tenure in Washington, he concluded that it would be hard to have much of an impact inside the Senate, where partisan conflict increasingly provoked filibuster threats, nomination fights and near gridlock even on routine spending bills....

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/us/politics/09obama.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&ref=todayspaper&adxnnlx=1205078535-0EtDQ8rmIZ6z/mbTMbcICw&pagewanted=all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Public servants, in the best cases, aspire to affect change for the public
good.

Conservatives generally hate Ted Kennedy, but Ted Kennedy has been a long-standing and very, very effective and influential member of the upper chamber. His older brothers were bored to bits in the Senate and couldn't wait to leave it.

Temperament and training always are interesting. Sometimes the party urges someone to run for an open seat because as a candidate that person would have a chance to turn it blue, but it's not the exact kind of job for that candidate in every case.

Obama may have the negotiating skills of Ted Kennedy, especially with the editing experience -- the details, the several-draft proposal strategies, etc. -- but he may also feel that he could affect change from the executive branch.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. So the truth is that Obama wimped out against the Iraq War?
I thought BO's entire justification for running was because he showed proper 'judgment' about the Iraq War. Ah, but that was back in 2002, when it didn't really matter what he thought.

But when it DID matter -- when Obama was actually in the Senate and in a position to DO something to end the war -- did he?

He did not. At least not according to this quote from the article:

He disappointed some Democrats by not taking a more prominent role opposing the war — he voted against a troop withdrawal proposal by Senators John Kerry of Massachusetts and Russ Feingold of Wisconsin in June 2006, arguing that a firm date for withdrawal would hamstring diplomats and military commanders in the field.

Another surprise this article reveals is that Kennedy and Daschle were both on BO's side all along. So Kennedy was LYING when he said he decided to step in and support Obama because of the 'racist' things the Clintons were saying. That was an alibi, an excuse, a justification -- it was not the truth.

The only theme in Barack Obama's political life seems to be: "Let's get me elected President." Consequently, although his legislative record is very thin and lacking in importance, it is devoid of controversy.

The path he has chosen to Pennsylvania Ave, is the route of being a good-looking, slim, well-dressed, charismatic, (and partly black at a propitious time) man who is careful never to say or do anything that will get in the way of being loved, loved, LOVED into the White House.

So far, it seems to be working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, all those "experienced" senators have done so well...
in preventing us from going to war for oil, protecting our Constitutional rights, and preventing the corporate elite from raiding the Treasury and our pockets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. same thing could probably be said about Clinton
Right after he dropped out of the race there was a Biden quote that essentially said "please find me a major bill in the senate that has Obama's or Clinton's name attached to it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. sounds like JFK right?
Edited on Sun Mar-09-08 12:23 PM by dmordue
supposedly his senate record was pretty weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-09-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I think it does. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC