Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama on judges: Protect the powerless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 11:53 AM
Original message
Obama on judges: Protect the powerless
Obama on judges: Protect the powerless
Posted May 8, 2008 7:30 PM
The Swamp

by James Oliphant


In a wide-ranging interview Thursday on CNN's Situation Room, Democratic front-runner Barack Obama outlined his vision for the Supreme Court and the federal judiciary.

"My first criteria is to make sure these are people are capable and competent," he told Wolf Blitzer. "Ninety-five percent of the time the law is so clear that it's just a matter of applying the law. I'm not somebody who believes in a bunch of judicial law-making."


He cited Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and David Souter as examples of the kinds of justices he would appoint to the high court, noting that Souter was appointed by President George H.W. Bush. (Obama, as a constitutional law professor, undoubtedly knows that Souter was a bit of a tabula rasa when chosen and has been a huge disappointment to conservatives ever since, but he didn't mention that.)

What you're looking for is somebody who is going to apply the law where it's clear. Now there's gonna be those five percent of cases or one percent of cases where the law isn't clear. And the judge has to then bring in his or her own perspectives, his ethics, his or her moral bearings.

And In those circumstance what I do want is a judge who is sympathetic enough to those who are on the outside, those who are vulnerable, those who are powerless, those who can't have access to political power and as a consequence can't protect themselves from being being dealt with sometimes unfairly, that the courts become a refuge for justice. That's been its historic role. That was its role in Brown v Board of Education.

We've got to make sure civil rights are protected. We have got to make sure civil liberties are protected. Because oftentimes there are pressures that are placed on politicians to want to set civil liberties aside, especially at times when we've had terrorist attacks. Making sure we maintain our separation of powers so we don't have a president who is taking over more and more power.


It's an interesting, if not shocking, exercise to match Obama's remarks up against those made by John McCain on judges earlier this week.

more...

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/05/obama_on_judges.html
Refresh | +3 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. The fate of the judicial branch in our Country lies with an Obama victory
everyone will lose every safe guard and liberty if McSame is allowed to appoint more Alitos to the SC
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for this highlight. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-09-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama is freaking wonderful! His analysis of judge's role is wonderful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC