Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

1981 and 2011: Network news interest in royal marriages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:22 PM
Original message
1981 and 2011: Network news interest in royal marriages
Events like the recent British royal wedding may explain why you don't like network news anymore post-Cronkite/Reasoner/Chancellor or Brokaw/Jennings/Rather (if you're old enough), or generally avoid it altogether.

In March 1981, Dan Rather succeeded Walter Cronkite as anchor of the CBS Evening News. At the time, the evening news shows on ABC and NBC both used multi-anchor, multi-location formats. ABC, on World News Tonight, had Frank Reynolds (or Ted Koppel) reporting political news from Washington, Max Robinson reporting national news from Chicago, and Peter Jennings reporting international news from London or other places. NBC had John Chancellor in New York and Roger Mudd in Washington. Before the Fairness Doctrine repeal and Telecommunications Act led to the networks bundling up on fluffy human interest stories and content-free, speculative, noisy irrelevance, you could actually watch real news on the commercial networks. Back then, the networks kept royal marriage-related background stories at low priority.

On the November 13, 1980 NBC Nightly News, John Chancellor delivered the first American TV news story about the Charles/Diana relationship with a 20-second summary about speculation that Prince Charles would marry Lady Diana Spencer. Then on January 2, 1981, Peter Jennings reported for 3.5 minutes about Prince Charles' relationship with Diana and his past relationships. Looking over the Vanderbilt archive from January to July 1981, I found that CBS and NBC only began covering Charles and Diana after the engagement and made full stories (which I define as at least one minute with a field reporter) only out of major events such as the prince visiting America or falling off horses (yes, really happened). Being based in London, Jennings clearly had the scoop on most news developments regionally including of Charles & Diana but at least kept those events as brief items in his reporting.

Fast-forward to post-1987 (when the Fairness Doctrine was repealed) with media deregulation and network news devolving into infotainment. When the paparazzi began hounding Prince William's then-girlfriend Kate Middleton, NBC found that to be worth full stories on January 7 AND January 9, 2007! ABC did a similar story on January 10. And when William and Kate ended their relationship on April 14, 2007, ABC summarized it for just 10 seconds, while CBS and NBC made full 2-minute stories about it.

And forget about facts, entire stories could be based on speculation or rumor now. On April 21, CBS even had a 2.5-minute speculative story about whether social class contributed to their breakup. On August 19, 2007, CBS had another content-free 2-minute story this time about rumors of royal engagements of Princes William and Harry. And NBC closed the October 25, 2010 Nightly News with another story speculating about a William/Kate marriage. If Chancellor were still alive today, he'd be screaming at NBC.

Back in '81, the rule was generally to keep trivial public appearances by royalty or other minor revelations as anchor-read briefs such as this one from the June 16, 1981 World News Tonight. To this year. On March 22, 2011, ABC World News devoted a 2 minute story to report that William and Kate will ride in Charles' and Diana's carriage! And on April 11, NBC Nightly News spent 2 minutes to report the last pre-wedding public appearance of Willam and Kate. As I pointed out here, NBC and the other networks and even PBS skipped a story about Bradley Manning that was covered on British TV that day.

Now of course royal engagements are newsworthy enough for full stories. But their placement on the evening news shows reflect the priority placed on them. When Charles and Diana were engaged on February 24, 1981, the networks all had full stories. It was the final story of night on ABC (1 minute 40 seconds) and CBS (3 min 50 sec). However, NBC made that the fifth story of the night (3:30), while the eighth story was about House Ways and Means members discussing Reaganomics, and that was for only 1:20.

William and Catherine were engaged on November 16, 2010. That was also the day when the House ethics committee convicted Rep. Charles Rangel of 11 ethics violations. Guess which story led?

CBS and NBC both led November 16 with full stories about the engagement. Could you imagine Walter Cronkite or John Chancellor making such decision? The networks have gone from concluding with a royal engagement story to calling it the TOP STORY! On NBC, Brian Williams merely summarized the Rangel conviction for 36 seconds, while CBS had a 1:23-long story by Nancy Cordes. In contrast, ABC put the engagement story after Diane Sawyer's special reports about China, and substitute anchor George Stephanopoulos summarized the Rangel conviction for only 20 seconds. And NBC even concluded November 16 with foreign affairs correspondent Andrea Mitchell (who normally reports on serious news) covering even more fluff about the engagement; in contrast, CBS concluded by promoting the documentary film Made in Deningham, about British working-class women going on strike from a Ford factory.

In contrast, the PBS NewsHour (which won a Cronkite Award recently) buried the engagement story in the "news wrap" section of various world news stories on November 16, led with a Congressional hearing on foreclosures (skipped by the Big 3 networks) and covered the Rangel conviction in full with a story and interview as the next-to-last story. This is why I'm grateful for the PBS NewsHour.

And finally, regarding the wedding day itself. On July 29, 1981, the day when the House of Representatives voted for President Reagan's tax cut bill and Charles and Diana formally wed, the networks all devoted significant coverage to both events. Frank Reynolds began World News Tonight by summarizing the House vote for 30 seconds; ABC then had a 7-minute story about the wedding followed by 4 minutes of tax cut coverage and many other stories. CBS had a similar format. On NBC, John Chancellor began with an in-studio 90-second summary of the wedding before 6.5 minutes on the House tax cut vote; NBC that night had 3 stories totaling 9 minutes about the royal wedding.

On April 29, 2011, CBS, NBC, and PBS led with the Alabama tornado, but ABC led with a 5-minute story about the royal wedding then had nearly 10 minutes of tornado coverage, another 3-minute retrospective of the royal wedding, then closed with brief summaries of oil profits, a Donald Trump speech in Las Vegas, and President Obama visiting the Kennedy Space Center. NBC covered only the wedding and tornado on Friday and predominantly the tornado. CBS had 6 minutes of tornado coverage and 12 minutes of wedding coverage and included brief item on Obama at Kennedy Space and a preview of the 60 Minutes Lara Logan interview.
Refresh | +5 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
4lbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 04:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Even cable channels got into it this time.
I remember History Channel, PBS, and TLC each having gobs of coverage last week, including some historical context with the weddings of Charles/Diana and the Coronation of Queen Elizabeth in 1953. Furthermore, History Channel and PBS covered the romance between Prince Edward and Wallis Simpson where he abdicated his throne to marry the divorced American woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. even a DU thread re the 11/16/2010 NBC Nightly News
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-12-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC