Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Yankees Paid More For ARod Than JPM Chase Paid for Bear Stearns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:53 PM
Original message
The Yankees Paid More For ARod Than JPM Chase Paid for Bear Stearns
Just some food for thought there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. He had a better year. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But JPM gets a great downtown building!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Their main offices are Midtown, Madison Ave.
This bldg alone has been "conservitavely" valued near $1 bill--MORE THAN 4 TIMES the buying price for THE WHOLE BALL O' WAX.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'd be surprised if Bear Sterns actually owned the building. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. They do according to this AP article
Source: Yahoo! News

After Bear Stearns rescue, who's next?
By JOE BEL BRUNO and MADLEN READ, AP Business Writers
Mon Mar 17, 1:27 PM ET


.....The acquisition includes Bear Stearns' headquarters, which as one of the world's tallest buildings could fetch more than $1 billion in a sale...

Article at link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/jpmorgan_bear_stearns


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Color me surprised. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. buh dum dum pssht
great minds . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. ARod probably has more non-foreclosed property than Bear Sterns. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice comparison. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traveling_Home Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. You stole that line!!! ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. What? You accusing him of Obama-ing that line?
:rofl:

Oh, C'mon, it was a joke!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. JPMorgan bought Bear Stearns with
money supplied by the Federal Reserve.

It was a total gift made by the taxpayer to JPMorgan.

The USA itself should own Bear Stearns, not tie a bow on it for another robber baron.

We need to get over the silly taboo that government cannot own businesses. The People should certainly own a company we paid for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That's Not a Bad Idea
If the bailout (or orderly liquidation) was done to prevent a general meltdown, I have no problem with the loan guarantees. However, it would have been nice for the government to get some value along with accepting the risk.

The government does not have to be the permanent owner -- the stock could have been sold gradually according to a public schedule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC