Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Suspicious trading....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
kalian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 11:11 PM
Original message
Suspicious trading....
http://www.axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/article_4708.shtml

Exchanges saw a huge spike in the purchase of Bank One options even before news of the huge J.P. Morgan acquisition broke. The transactions were enormously profitable for a fortunate few.



Coincidence or insider trading...? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lcordero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-18-04 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. And I'll bet that not one of them are going to see jail time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-19-04 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Speculation on their yahoo message board a day or two early.
Of course, those things go on all the time (speculation that is).

But combined with trading activity??


Will be interesting to watch
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. The entire system is rigged to allow insider trading
as the article says, this is so obviously a situation that begs the question...

YET, if it was someone "lower on the rung" who does not have the responsiblity NOT to give insider information...

then it isn't insider information...

so all that has to happen is for the insider to tell the messenger who can avoid the letter of the law while violating the spirit of the law, whose intent is to allow as level a playing field as possible.

this is why the stock market is total bullshit and it is immoral, imo, that people can make shitloads of money by doing nothing other than being privvy to information they shouldn't have in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually, you can make shitloads of money by being
a good guesser. Like Vegas, but even more rigged. The
really cool thing about stock is it's just like being able
to print your own money, as long as you can get people to
buy it. You just buy some paper and print as much as you
want and sell it, and bingo, there is all that money, and
you owe squat but some vague fiduciary duties in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. You don't even need paper anymore
since most stocks today are merely computer files
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-21-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You are correct, but
Edited on Wed Jan-21-04 11:20 AM by bemildred
"buy some magnetic media" doesn't read as well ...
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Unless you're Martha! Interesting how "examples" are picked to target
for "insider trading" isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcgowanjm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. yes, the entire game is rigged
That's why Spitzer will have to be bought off
soon.

BTW, the JPM/ONE deal is being seen as a
merger of weakness.
The JPM/Chase deal never has panned out.

And like the BankAmerica/Fleet deal
the odds are high that it won't go thru.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-20-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And this is why the bush style tax cut was b.s.
because his tax cut, unlike a payroll tax cut, put more money into the hands of the already affluent, who can then spend it betting among themselves in the stock market. Sure, they can buy another house or whatever, but their basic needs are more than met, and then it becomes an issue of who can finagle the most monopoly money.

It sounds like you're saying that the money making is all on the buzz, both then, and with your rumor that it won't go through.

Like too much, it's all just shimmery surface, all shiny happy people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC