Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schrodinger's Cat and the financial meltdown - why Obama is not transparent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Tigermoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:18 AM
Original message
Schrodinger's Cat and the financial meltdown - why Obama is not transparent
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 10:22 AM by Tigermoose
This is a Schrodinger's Cat situation. If we open the box and look at the cat, we will have forced a decision and it is really going to be horrible if the cat is dead. The hope is that if we wait long enough without opening the box, maybe dump some cat food and water in there without looking, the cat will emerge on its own as it has regained its health.

In other words....if we really force a write down of the toxic assets by "looking," the financial world will collapse given the current market.

Edit: And by the way, that cat has a deadly, infectious virus. If you open the box and the cat is dead, that virus is going to spread and wipe out vast amounts of capital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. What a brilliant metaphor!
That really resonates. Thank you for thinking of it and posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marketcrazy1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. but the cat
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 11:03 AM by marketcrazy1
has been stuck in the box for quite some time and since it has no where to go it has been peeing in the corner of the box. pretty soon the floor of the box will rot and the cat will come crashing through, perhaps collapsing the box or at least leaving a nasty hole in it, when the cat falls out the virus will be released. it might be better to isolate the cat and cure the virus, then the cat could be nursed back to health and the box put to better use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigermoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, that is the debate.
Do we decide that the cat is dead and look, or do we wait and hope it emerges healthy. The first choice, at this point, is a self-fulfilling prophecy. The second choice offers at least some hope. But it might be that that hope is foolish and will only cause more suffering if the cat is indeed already dead and incapable of regaining its health.

Many people are just upset and accusing Obama of conspiring with the bankers. Obviously, they feel that the cat is already dead. If that is the case, there arguments are correct. But that is not entirely clear.

And anyway, can the government currently handle the massive takeover that would be necessary? I don't know if they have the manpower and resources. This isn't something you can do one at a time or over a long period of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Wishful thinking
is no basis for the allocation of trillions of dollars that properly belongs to the people of this country.

And the sad part is that you've stated the case for that wishful thinking as well as anybody else - there IS no better case to be made for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duende azul Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Let´s think outside the box.
Capitalism isn't history's last chapter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. "He's Dead, Jim"
You don't have to open the box even. The smell is a dead giveaway. Pun fully intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. does non-locality offer any hope, or is that the equivalent of the virus metaphor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlowDownFast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Excellent.
Not the reality of it, but your explanation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. In this case, the cat is dead
and they're throwing trillions of our money down the sewer in order to pretend that by not opening the box, they can preserve a chance of the dead cat still being alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Exactly. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigermoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I'm not sure if this is really throwing away money down the sewer..
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 02:47 PM by Tigermoose
I mean, we have a fiat currency. Since trillions of dollars in capital is being erased through deleveraging, it shouldn't hurt for the government to create some of that money back into existence. Now, that does raise our federal deficit, but think about the enormous capital black hole that would result if the top 10 banks collapsed and were unable to cover their liabilities. Where would the government then get their tax revenue? If that happened, we would see some truly staggering federal deficits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
9. TPTB are pretending the probability wave function hasn't collapsed yet
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 01:34 PM by GliderGuider
But we can tell from the smell that somebody peeked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Excellent Analysis
Also indicates how complicated our Economic system. I remember doing a two page answer to a graduate school question in economics using quantum mechanics metaphors many years ago.

Beautiful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigermoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The metaphor of a financial black hole is also coming to mind
The universe is inflationary, constantly waging a war against deflationary gravity. The government and the Fed create the inflation that keeps our economy growing, but it appear there is a point where the power of gravity (deflation) overwhelms the inflationary force and a deflationary black hole develops that beings sucking the economy into itself. At what point do the forces of inflation prevail and the economy begins inflating again?

One thing is clear. We have to have a functioning inflationary force for this to happen. That force is the banking system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duende azul Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Your brilliant image only works if we only had this one and only box (=capitalism)
Why cling to the capitalist belief system?

So we could leave this box alone with the kitty alive or dead (who cares?) and look at all the other boxes around.
Much more so if we know, that capitalism won´t work eternally? Marx knew.


Not to offend the kitteh lovers on DU (wouldn´t risk that, for the record: I love cats. This isn´t about a real kitty. ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigermoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Revolutions are really not that fun to live through imho
I am a family man, and the last thing I want is the sort of social upheaval that would come with changing our underlying economic system. I don't see a utopia formed by revolution, but only bloodshed and another system that will be corrupted by human greed and immorality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duende azul Donating Member (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Our underlying economic system
is causing bloodshed and starvation all around and did so all along the way since it's conception.

We can debate the means of abolishing it. Capitalism isn't some law of nature we can't get rid of.
Theoretically it could even be put to rest by elections. So there seems not necessarily to be a need for revolution. At least as long as the profiteers let it go without furthering the repression. And even then there have to be ways to opt out of this madness nonviolently.

If we let capitalism go down by itself due to it's inner contradictions we will witness havoc.
We can't afford to just stand by and watch.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Need to know and afraid to find out n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why couldn't Schrodinger's Box have a spider in it?
Then I wouldn't care whether it was dead or not--in fact, I might prefer it. But I lie awake nights worrying about Schrodinger's damned cat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. how can we be so stupid as to hope at a time like this?
as a certain candidate for president was known to point out- we have no choice.

i find that across the board, the human animal likes numbers. they find ways to quantify things that are unquantifiable. like the potential of a child, expressed as his or her iowa scores, or sat's. it is always very hard to argue with someone who has numbers, when the discussion is really about emotional things. but make no mistake, the economy runs on emotion. on hope or fear. those are pretty much our only choices.
time to cross our fingers and hope for the best.
i trust my president to do the right thing. doesn't mean i agree on everything. but he has gathered as many smart guys as he can find. we may not like some of the things they have done in the past, or disagree with their philosophy, but they know where all the bodies are buried.

might as well hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigermoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. I agree wholeheartedly. It comes down to hope, trust, and a community of faith.
We all have to believe in our fiat economic system and government for them to work effectively. The worst thing about some revolutionary Republicans and some Democrats is that they promote complete distrust and pessimism rather than criticism that still believes in the underlying positive function of both our government and economic system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. Screw the Cat - I want a new Puppy
Oh - and the box is starting to smell.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. We can quietly throw in some mousy accountants.
Forewarned is forearmed. Psssst! Sigh!

Nothing, but, ...

Psi-squared gives a good look at the probabilities. We can see our way from there. After dealing with those donuts and dumbbells.

for dizzy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
westerebus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
21. Dead cat.
Looking into the box, the observer as catalyst, does not determine the fate of the cat. It simply confirms the possible outcome by eliminating other possibilities. Perhaps there was no cat to begin with. The cat escaped by means other than supra natural abilities.

The real story is Schroedinger's wife never liked the cat which is how the cat got in the box in the first place. Schrodinger actually hid the cat after the wife put him in the box and provided the dead cat explanation should she look into the box. Guilt by association, to the means available through actions causing the possibility of death to occur at the outset, that she denied.

The cat moved into a neighbor's home up the street. He was given a new name. The supposed virus that killed him was in fact very toxic to rodents. He was immune to its' effects. The rodents in the neighborhood were not and dropped dead in droves. Hence the smell coming from the house in which the Schroedinger's lived because their cat was gone.

The cat's new name: OVERSIGHT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC