Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With Rice Stocks At Lowest In 30 Years, World's Leading Expert Notes "Worrisome Signs" For Future

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:37 PM
Original message
With Rice Stocks At Lowest In 30 Years, World's Leading Expert Notes "Worrisome Signs" For Future
MANILA (AFP) - The world's top rice expert warned here Friday of "worrisome signs," with high prices for rice and fertiliser and stocks at their lowest levels for about 30 years.

Robert Zeigler, director general of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), said new farm technologies were needed to replicate the gains made from the "Green Revolution," which had lifted hundreds of millions of rural Asians out of poverty.

"There are a number of worrisome signs suggesting that new challenges lie ahead," he told an international rural poverty conference in the Philippine capital Manila.

"There has been a slowdown in growth in rice production as the yield gains from the adoption of the modern varieties in the irrigated areas have become almost fully exploited and the rice area is declining," Zeigler said. "Over the past five years, (the) international rice price has doubled and price for urea (fertiliser) tripled, the latter spurred on by the rise in oil prices."

EDIT

http://www.philstar.com/index.php?News%20Flash&p=54&type=2&sec=91&aid=2007081031
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. is this why the price of my rice milk at Trader Joe's just shot up?
I swear, it thought it'd be cheaper to eat lower on the food chain -- and usually it is, but in the "dairy" dept, the faux/non- cow stuff doesn't enjoy the price subsidies the bovine-derived offerings do...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Peak Rice?
"The yield gains from the adoption of the modern varieties in the irrigated areas have become almost fully exploited and the rice area is declining."

How about a rousing chorus of "Malthus was right after all! Told you so, told you so."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good thing rapid climate destabilization could never hurt crop production, huh?
And to think I used to worry about such things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. Instead of Peak Oil, it appears that Peak Food may just be our
most immediate concern......

Stock up on those garden seeds, folks. Plant fruit trees in your yard instead of exotic ornamentals. Learn how to produce and process your own food. For those with a little more land (1/2 acre+), learn how to plant, harvest, and process corn as a grain crop (YES, it can be done all by hand easily). Get yourself some chickens and rabbits. And hang onto your hats, it's gonna be a rough ride.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I used to shuck corn for my grandmother's chickens.
The corn was grown on the old farm with mechanization, but not lots of fertilizer inputs besides cattle manure. The chickens ate what they could find when the garden was not in full production (they were free range otherwise), and ate lots of hand-shucked corn during the winter. My grandmother or one of us grandchildren usually did the shucking.

For the uninitiated, "shucking" corn means to remove the dry kernels from a dry ear of corn. Chi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-10-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. here's an idea. Let's use rice to create gasohol, that ought to boost production
and increase rice availability, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. ". . . and rice growing area is declining."
That could mean climate change from global warming OR it could be "development" of rice fields into industry or housing.

In the U.S., at least prior to the last few years' droughts, there has been a major reduction of good, generally well watered farmland due to "development" otherwise known as sprawl. The problem is incredibly acute on the east coast and in the midwest.

At what point will we in the U.S. be unable to export food or even feed ourselves decently (less corn-fed beef) because we have destroyed too much high quality farmland? To my mind, we must redevelop urban and suburban land, reduce house size and stabilize our population.

Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Neither - it's because of "double-cropping"
http://www.irri.org/publications/today/pdfs/6-3/19-21.pdf

According to
the Food and
Agriculture
Organization
of the United
Nations (FAO),
the global rice
area harvested
in 2005 was
153 million
hectares. The amount of land used for
rice is less, in the order of 127 million
hectares, because in some fields
farmers plant two, or even three,
rice crops each year. One hectare
of double-cropped land therefore
provides 2 hectares of rice area each
year (areas referred to hereafter
are harvested areas, as opposed to
actual land areas).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Thanks for the info. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Interesting. you gotta wonder what that does to the soil nutrient budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC