Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nature - GHG Levels Rising At Pace Well Above That Of 1990s

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 12:33 PM
Original message
Nature - GHG Levels Rising At Pace Well Above That Of 1990s
Levels of greenhouse gases are rising faster this decade than they did during the 1990s, according to a new analysis. The research blames the acceleration on a combination of factors, including economic growth, intensive fossil-fuel use and, perhaps most worringly, an apparent decline in the oceans' ability to suck up carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

Before 2000, atmospheric carbon dioxide levels had been rising by about 1.5 parts per million (p.p.m.) per year. Since the turn of the century, that figure has jumped to 1.9 p.p.m. per year, says Josep Canadell of the Global Carbon Project in Canberra, Australia, who led the new survey. According to their analysis, almost two-thirds of the change is due to increasing world economic activity. Roughly half of the rest is down to increased reliance on high-emission fossil fuels throughout much of the world's economy, with China a significant contributor, Canadell says.

The rest of the observed difference is explained by the worsening performance of the oceans in absorbing carbon dioxide, Canadell's team reports. "Fifty years ago, if we emitted a tonne of CO2, sinks would remove 600 kilograms of it," he says. "Now it's 550 kilos and this amount is declining," he says.

It is unclear why the oceans' capacity is going down, but it is thought that the surface layers may be becoming saturated with greenhouse gas — partly because of increasing levels in the atmosphere and partly because of reduced ocean mixing that would bring unsaturated waters to the surface.

EDIT

http://www.nature.com/news/2007/071022/full/news.2007.186.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Something ELSE no one could have forseen, right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-25-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Nope. No one.
:silly: :nuke:

"Silly nuke, extinction is for primates..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC