Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Bangladesh) Priority to the fertilizer plants, instead of the power plants: asked to Petrobangla

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 12:42 PM
Original message
(Bangladesh) Priority to the fertilizer plants, instead of the power plants: asked to Petrobangla
Tamim asked Petrobangla to give priority to fertilizer plants as the meeting observed that if there were electricity shortage, Boro cultivation would not be hampered as electricity could be ensured by cutting supply to urban areas, but if there were fertilizer shortage there would be a serious problem as it would take time to import fertilizer. The meeting discussed the gas shortage in the Chittagong belt because of the declining gas production in the offshore Sangu gas-field.

http://www.independent-bangladesh.com/200801291078/business/-priority-to-the-fertilizer-plants-instead-of-the-power-plants-asked-to-petrobangla.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy Chittagong, Batman!
From the article:

The production capacity of Sangu... has gradually declined to around 60 million cubic feet per day in recent times from 150 mmcfd in 2006.

That's a loss of 60% in under two years! Everyone in the biz says that gas depletion is much faster than oil depletion because of the lower viscosity of gas, and here's your evidence. They've walked off the cliff in Chittagong.

This brings up more thoughts I've had recently in relation to the future food supply of Africa and South Asia. Declining gas supplies are going to deal a staggering blow to the fertilizer business, both because local gas supplies may dry up and Peak Gas causing a large escalation in gas prices. That will price fertilizer on the world market out of the reach of third world farmers, causing a certain decline in crop yields over the next 10 to 20 years.

Add to that the water crisis: www.ifpri.org/media/water_countries.htm
India and China are both sucking their fossil aquifers dry, and 95% of African agriculture is rain-fed just as climate change comes along to screw up the rainfall patterns.

All while their population is growing.

Paging Mr. Malthus, party of 0...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. A strange game, Dr. Malthus.
The only way to win is not to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Did anyone think the West would feel the pain first?
That's a rhetorical question. I've read your monographs. It's all happening, maybe with a little less drama than we anticipated.

Poverty is a silent and lonely fate; and people who die of starvation sleep a lot toward the end. I've watched a few people die of disease-induced starvation, including my grandmother.

Six billion people ... I wonder how long it will take? And if we actually can reverse it, I wonder how long we will drag our feckless feet?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patch1234 Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. stop using NG for electricity production, would help a lot
the article implies they have been forced to do
exacatly that, how about planning ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-31-08 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. And use what, exactly?
They have no hydro (Bangladesh is very flat) and they don't have the technological infrastructure or money for nuclear power. That leaves coal, oil and natural gas. They have insignificant coal reserves. They produce only 6,000 barrels of oil a day. In fact their coal and oil production is so low it doesn't even rate a line in the BP Statistical Review of World Energy spreadsheet, while at least their natural gas production is given. They already use less energy per capita than any other country on Earth. How would planning have helped Bangladesh avoid this crisis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC