Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sea Shepherd's Non-Toxic, Organic, Non-Violent Response to Whale Killers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 09:57 PM
Original message
Sea Shepherd's Non-Toxic, Organic, Non-Violent Response to Whale Killers
Sea Shepherd's Non-Toxic, Organic, Non-Violent Response to Whale Killers
Sea Shepherd News
News Releases
03/04/2008

In Africa, Somali poachers are shot on sight for poaching elephants and the world approves.

In India, Indian poachers are shot for poaching tigers.

Yet when the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society crew tosses rotten butter onto the deck of a wealthy high-tech Japanese whale poaching vessel in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary, there is a gasp of horror from those who fear to offend the great economic bully from Asia.

The crew of the Steve Irwin did not injure anyone. The entire confrontation was documented by both ships and there has been no video shown by either side documenting violent actions against the very violent whalers. We even offered to send our medical doctor onboard the Nisshin Maru to treat the alleged injuries and to confirm the claim that there were any injuries at all. The Nisshin Maru denied the request.

With all the reaction in some media outlets, one would think the Japanese whalers are the innocent victims of a horrific act of violence.

Yet these same whalers are violating international conservation law and an Australian Federal Court order by illegally slaughtering endangered whales in an established whale sanctuary.

The Sea Shepherd crew did not shoot any of these poachers like the rangers in Africa would when they encounter elephant killers in the bush. No, we tossed rotten butter and fake banana peels onto their deck to discourage their illegal operations. The material tossed onto the deck of the Nisshin Maru was both organic and non-toxic.

The Japanese whalers are spinning the story describing butter acid as caustic and harmful when it is completely harmless. Not all acids are harmful; if they were we would not drink orange juice and some just smell bad.

It is a fact that butter becomes Butyric acid when it goes bad. That does not make it toxic, just obnoxiously smelly.

The objective in tossing a foul smelling substance onto the deck of the largest floating slaughterhouse in the world is simple - to discourage the grisly work of mutilating the bodies of some of the largest and gentlest creatures on Earth.

There is no industry on earth as horrifically violent as whaling. Whales die in prolonged unimaginable agony as blunt tipped harpoons smash into their backsides and shred internal organs. They may take up to forty minutes to die as they drown in a mixture of salt water and their own blood. They thrash and roll on the surface of the sea and scream piteously as they look up to see arrogant men gloating over their suffering.

Yet, some people get upset because these same people now have smelly decks and can't continue their foul sadistic work.

For the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, our clients are the whales and we are defending them by intervening to enforce international conservation law in accordance to the principles established by the United Nations World Charter for Nature.

We have not committed any crime. Despite the fabrications of Japanese public relations spin doctors, we have not injured anyone. In fact in over thirty years of high seas interventions the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society has never caused an injury nor have we been convicted of a felony.

Yet in that time whalers, sealers, shark finners, turtle poachers and illegal fishermen have assaulted us, beaten us, bloodied us, rammed us, shot at us and threatened our lives but that never seems to be a story of interest because according to our critics we are exposing ourselves voluntarily to the violence of the ocean rapists. In fact, after being assaulted by sealers who struck my crew with clubs and injured them the Canadian police refused to press charges against our attackers because we "had provoked the violence by opposing the killing of seals."

We have had a very successful campaign this year in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. We have saved hundreds of whales. We have chased this Japanese killing fleet for thousands of miles and they will not fill their death quota and they are not very happy about it.

The crew of the Sea Shepherd ship Steve Irwin are satisfied that we behaved responsibly, that we did not injure anyone, that we did not damage any property. They are satisfied that we have saved lives, hundreds of lives of the most social complex, gentle and intelligent creatures in the sea.

We did our planetary duty and we upheld the law and all of us on this gallant ship are both proud and satisfied at what we have accomplished.

http://seashepherd.org/news/media_080304_1.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Patchuli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am happy to be the first to Kick and Rec this one!
Go Sea Shepard! Go Green Peace!!! Go Whales!!!!

Smelly rancid butter? heheheeee!!!!

:kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Even the Dalai Lama supports Sea Shepherd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-04-08 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R - Come on, one more puts this puppy on the Greatest Page in honour of Paul Watson and the whales
Sea Shepherd, :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
losthills Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. K and R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thought I'd K & R this whilst awaiting ...
... the arrival of the Japanese public relations spin doctors ...

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. I have a question.
In places like Africa or India, the law of the land is (I assume) unambiguous. A country can pass a law that poaching is illegal, and furthermore a capital offense, punishable by being shot on sight, etc, and it's clear whose law applies in any given location.

How clear, or unclear, are the legalities for cetacean hunting, in international waters?

(Not to be confused with the ethics)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sadly, the wording is NOT unambiguous as it leaves wiggle room ...
... so the answer you get depends on who you ask.

The commercial hunting of whales is illegal.
This is very clear and unambiguous though largely ignored by all countries
for political reasons (else Norway, Iceland and Japan would all be in deep
shit and forced to stop).

The "aboriginal hunting" of whales is licenced and controlled (though
not tightly enough as shown by last year's farce where native yahoos
killed a whale for the hell of it). It is clear and unambiguous
(though there is pressure to alter it from time to time).

The "scientific hunting" of whales is the wiggle room: such an oxymoronic
concept was only included in the wording thanks to the political pressure
of the primary whaling countries but has since been expanded to "justify"
the slaughter of whales for commercial purposes under the thinly veiled
pretence of "research".

This is the cause of the current dispute where the Japanese industrial
whaling fleet is slaughtering whales for sale in Japan (where it is heavily
subsidised by the Japanese government as the majority of the Japanese people
wouldn't touch whale-meat with a bargepole - hence the sale of it for dog
food and school dinners ...).

The ethics aren't in dispute nor are the morals of the people who engineer
loopholes in laws for the sole purpose of exploitation.

> a capital offense, punishable by being shot on sight

If only. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC