Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PEMEX To Boost Output In Declining Cantarell Field (Actual Headline!) - OGJ

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:38 PM
Original message
PEMEX To Boost Output In Declining Cantarell Field (Actual Headline!) - OGJ
LOS ANGELES, Mar. 4 -- Average output at Mexico's Cantarell oil field will decline by as much as 20% this year as the field matures, a Petroleos Mexicanos executive reported.

Carlos Morales Gil, Pemex exploration and production director, said the state firm will reverse the decline when the company installs new production equipment at the field. The energy ministry has said investment in Cantarell would reach $5 billion this year.

Morales said output at Cantarell will range from 1.2-1.3 million b/d this year, compared with an average of 1.5 million in 2007.

According to figures published by the energy ministry, Cantarell's output had already slipped to 1.27 million b/d in January, down some 230,000 b/d from the 1.6 million b/d in January 2007. In fourth-quarter 2007 Pemex drilled five new development wells at Cantarell and repaired nine major wells and 10 smaller wells. During first-quarter 2008, the company plans to complete a nitrogen recovery unit in the field.

EDIT

http://www.ogj.com/display_article/321898/7/ONART/none/DriPr/1/Pemex-to-boost-output-in-declining-Cantarell-field/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. "........as the field matures......" - they should be saying:
".....as the field peters out....."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. "The last time Tap toured America, they were booked into 10,000-seat arenas, and 15,000-seat venues
. . . and it seems that now, on their current tour they're being booked into 1,200 seat arenas, 1,500 seat arenas, and uh I was just wondering, does this mean uh...the popularity of the group is waning?

Ian: Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no...no, no, not at all. I, I, I just think that the.. uh.. their appeal is becoming more selective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. hatrack, whatcha smokin' there? Say WHAT????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Spinal Tap humor.
The best kind of humor there is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oy. I guess my BIL would get it (he has seen Spinal Tap many times).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. for your viewing pleasure:
(actual quote is about 8 minutes in)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=lVVahII-EIo&feature=related
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Sounds like they plan on going to '11' on the wellhead pumps n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. The problem with that plan is...
If you put ten straws in a glass of lemonade it's still just a single glass of lemonade. It just won't last as long with ten people slurping it up. Dropping extra wells might give you a temporary boost in capacity, but at the cost of depleting the whole field that much sooner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Basically, yes, but the nitrogen recovery will let you get more out
than you would have otherwise, since you are squeezing the sponge dry, so to speak. But the point remains, and it's a big one, the fields in decline and it will cost more (nitrogen systems, new wells etc.) per barrel to get the remaining oil out. Or in other words, the essence of peak oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-06-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. aka pumping out the sludge at the bottom. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC