Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interior proposes wilderness protection in blatant politcal ploy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:23 AM
Original message
Interior proposes wilderness protection in blatant politcal ploy
About 80 percent of the Apostle Islands National Lakeshore in northern Wisconsin will be protected permanently as a wilderness if final recommendations accepted Thursday by the U.S. Interior Department are adopted by Congress.

Park Superintendent Bob Krumenaker said that most of the area already is managed as a wilderness, so the park's estimated 180,000 annual visitors would notice few changes.

-snip-

Under the proposal, published earlier this year by the National Park Service, most of the islands would be designated as wilderness, ensuring that motorized recreation, logging, mining and other development would be prohibited. Lake Superior portions of the park surrounding the islands would remain open to motorboats.

Melissa Lindsay, executive director of the Minneapolis-based Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness, noted that the final Apostle Islands wilderness study was published in March. She charged that the timing of Thursday's announcement during the campaign season was designed to divert attention from the Bush administration's "abysmal environmental record."

http://www.startribune.com/stories/531/4962369.html

Guilty as charged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. No coincidence in timing - nothing to see here, move along!
Also interesting that most of the park is under wilderness management - this is basically legalistic window dressing, though it may afford some extra protection.

Only one other question - will this still be in the cards on November 3rd?

I didn't think so either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. True, it is already under wildnerness management..
but without Congressional designation that management plan can be changed willy-nilly by NPS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC