Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They called Chernobyl 'the new Venice'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:39 AM
Original message
They called Chernobyl 'the new Venice'
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/they-called-chernobyl-lsquothe-new-venicersquo-802533.html

They called Chernobyl ‘the new Venice’

Norman Dombey on myths and legends about nuclear power

Sunday, 30 March 2008


John Hutton, Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, said last week: "I want Britain to be leading the world in the development and application of this new generation of low-carbon power technology." He then called for the creation of a £20bn industry with 100,000 new jobs, making the UK "the gateway to a new nuclear renaissance across Europe".

Hurrah, hurrah! A new dawn! Except that we have heard it all before, and are yet to catch a glimpse of the previous bonanza we have been promised.

I'm not anti-nuclear power, merely sceptical about its supposedly magical benefits. It became the answer to our problems over 50 years ago, when the Queen opened the world's first nuclear power station, Calder Hall at Windscale. Eight years later, Fred Lee, Minister of Power under Harold Wilson, told the Commons: "I am quite sure that we have hit the jackpot ... We have the greatest breakthrough of all time." He was announcing another "new generation" of nuclear stations based on the British designed advanced gas-cooled reactor. He went on to say: "As we now know, there is something like a 10 per cent advantage in this development, and it could be greater ... Certainly a 10 per cent saving is involved." The first station of this new generation was to be built at Dungeness in Kent; Dungeness B was ordered a few months later, in August 1965. The reactor eventually started up, 10 years late, in December 1982. It cost more than five times the 1965 estimates.

Another exciting new dawn came shortly after Margaret Thatcher took office in 1979. David Howell, the Secretary of State for Energy, announced another new generation of reactors: this time a US-designed pressurised water reactor would be built at Sizewell in Suffolk. His junior minister, Norman Lamont, soon declared "the government's intention to build at least one nuclear power station a year for the next 10 years". One – Sizewell – was built. Eventually, in 1995, it produced electricity for the grid, 15 years after Howell's announcement, costing 50 per cent more than the original estimate.

<snip>

Norman Dombey, Emeritus Professor of Theoretical Physics at the University of Sussex, advised the Commons Select Committee on Energy in 1979

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
americanyouth Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. While frustrating, trial and error is the only way to advance civilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-03-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Windscale reactor
Edited on Thu Apr-03-08 10:16 AM by Turbineguy
was graphite moderated (like Chernobyl). It had a reactor fire during an annealing process.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windscale_fire.

The Chernobyl accident was due to a "prompt critical excursion" (don't you just love engineering terms?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC