Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't eat your dog!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:19 AM
Original message
Don't eat your dog!
I wasn't planning to anyway, but...

http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/features/mutts/blog/2008/04/is_your_pet_toxic.html

"The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has found that cats and dogs are polluted with even higher levels of many of the same synthetic industrial chemicals that researchers have recently found in people, including newborns.

An EWG study found dogs and cats were contaminated with 48 of 70 industrial chemicals tested, including 43 chemicals at levels higher than those typically found in people. The study tested blood and urine from 20 dogs and 40 cats.

Compared to the average levels found in humans in national studies, dogs had 2.4 times the amounts of stain-and grease-proof coatings (perfluorochemicals). Cats had 23 times more fire retardants (PBDEs), and more than 5 times the amounts of mercury."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. and don't set your cat on fire! -- fire retardents?!?!
recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Oh, BAD you.
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Human flesh would not meet food safety regulations
I remember a study put out in the early 1980s about how "long pig" would fail pretty much every food safety rule due to the amount and type of chemicals that make up so much of the human diet, not to mention all the environmental toxins from auto and factory emissions, chemicals seeping or directly added to drinking water, heavy metals, pesticides, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. In that case, don't eat people either
We should all wear warning labels
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I had an boyfriend once who used to joke...
That, after having grown up in a neighborhood latter discovered to have been built on mine tailing with toxic levels of heavy metals, California state law required that he carry a disclaimer: This product contains chemicals known to the State of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. (Generally speaking, once heavy metals like mercury, lead and selenium enter the body, they are incorporated into tissue and stay there for as long as you live.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. that depends :evilgrin:
on ones definition of eating:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. I guess don't eat your newborn either then.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm a little too old for newborns
but I promise to leave the cats alone

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Too bad about that. They're yummy.
:9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. Dammit....
...An hour earlier, and we would've have been fine. Hey ho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh no - we can't even use "Soylent Green" for food!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-21-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Warning: The Surgeon General
has determined that Soylent Green can be extremely hazardous to your health. On the bright side, it is rarely addictive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC