Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China is world's 3rd largest country in terms of solar production capacity

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 09:53 AM
Original message
China is world's 3rd largest country in terms of solar production capacity
http://www.pr-inside.com/china-has-become-the-world-s-3rd-r585840.htm

After 20 years of development, the solar heaters industry has entered a mature stage. But, the domestic and international demand has not been met. With the fast growth of the real estate industry in the past few years and breakthroughs in integrated buildings and solar heat technologies, the industry is expected to maintain its current momentum of stable growth.

In the solar photovoltaic generation field, China has become the world's 3rd largest country in terms of solar cell output and production capacity. There is a trend of shift to China of the various links of the industry, from multiple crystal silicon to solar cell components. Growth in investment and financing has reached a crazy level.

In the face of competitions as well as market changes and challenges, the 2007-2008 Annual Report on the Development of China's Solar Energy Industry released by our team will help enterprises, investors and industry persons to more accurately grasp the growth pattern of China's solar energy industry, gain a more profound understanding of the prospects for industry growth and make wise investment decisions-

More in-depth and detailed analysis of industry situation. Based on statistics on the Chinese and international solar energy industry and from the aspects of industrial environment, industry size, industry structure and profit level, our team performs an in-depth analysis of the development situation and basic characteristics of China's solar energy industry. It also provide a key introduction to major countries of solar energy applications (Germany, Japan and USA) and to major regions of solar energy applications in China (Beijing, Tibet, Guangdong and Jiangsu), thus presenting readers with the basic infromaiton of he solar energy industry.

<more>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Solar panels built with the dirtiest coal-fired industry on earth
Will the irony never end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But, wait ... there's more!
http://www.enn.com/pollution/article/32974">The Dirty Side of a “Green” Industry (ENN)

It's about how China's solar industry has become a major source of toxic waste.

The article is from two months ago.

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, it doesn't appear to me that they actually care
There's no price being paid for their polluting ways, so in their minds, why change what's working? The government views it's people as disposible pieces to be changed as they get sick, and the developed nations only care about the cheapest price. Until the rest of the world does something, nothing will ever change there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. and what does this portend for the Chinese nuclear power industry?
glow-slaves anyone??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. More people are being poisoned by solar power production than nuke production in china.
Don't pretend otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. back it up
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Disprove it
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Here ya go...
http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/index.html?http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/655/5799.php

<snip>

Chinese national uranium mines, most of them located in the less developed western regions, are reported to be causing environmental pollution and health risks to local residents. Cases of radiation poisoning affecting local residents have, for example, been reported from uranium mine No. 792 in Diebu County, Gansu Province. The mine opened in 1967, run by the military, annually milled between 140 and 180 tons of uranium bearing rocks. In 2002, the mine officially was closed down due to ore exhaustion and outdated equipment. However, it continues operation as a private owned mine operated by Longjiang Nuclear Ltd. Since 1988, Sun Xiaodi, a former employee repeatedly travelled to Beijing and met with foreign journalists to make the case public. In early 2005, he was detained by public security forces. He was released later that year, but ever since remains under police surveillance. In 2006 Sun Xiaodi was awarded with the international Nuclear-Free Future Resistance Award. (*5).

<more>

http://www.armscontrolwonk.com/1295/guangyuan-plutonium-production-reactor

<snip>

China’s plutonium production reactors may have suffered operating probelms evident to the US intelligence community. Both sets of authors agree that operating histories might result in lower estimates, as Albright and Hinderstein explain:

Total production is therefore estimated as 2-5 tonnes of weapon-grade plutonium. Because of the lack of hard evidence on the production facilities, in particular on the power and operating histories of the reactors, Wright and Gronlund state that their estimates have a high degree of uncertainty.

Wright and Gronlund specifically mention rumors of a “a fire during the 1970s that seriously crippled” one of the reactors.

Declassified U.S. intelligence documents confirm that China’s plutonium production facilities encountered significant technical problems. The declassified report, China: Plutonium Production Reactor Problems (CIA: January 1988), is almost entirely redacted … but the title kind of sez it all, don’t it?

<more>

http://www.tew.org/development/tibet.minerals.html

<snip>

The region around Tanjianshan in far northern Tibet supports extensive forests, open grassland and montane steppe. The broad, flat, fertile valleys provide ideal grazing land. These slopes, although cold, are well watered and have been home to Tibetan nomadic herders and their yaks for centuries. The Chinese government considers the area as wasteland. "Not only is this forest and pasture area under threat from the direct impacts of mining, but the Tibetan experience of Chinese mining almost invariably involves severe deforestation of the surrounding area for mine infrastructure and housing," Lafitte said. In addition to the mining activities, Tibetan communities in this region have been displaced by China's plutonium and weapons manufacturing plants nearby in the Gobi desert, and a massive influx of Chinese Muslim settlers financed by the World Bank. These transmigrants, brought to Tibet to increase the Chinese population and to provide labour for other nearby projects, have raised the population density to the limits of the region's carrying capacity. Despite the influx of economic projects, the majority of the benefits will be gained in metropolitan centres distant from Tibet. China has made minimal investments in soft infrastructure for the local Tibetans in terms of health care, education and skills training.

<more>

and there's a reason for the dearth of environmental/worker-safety info for China's nuclear infrastructure....

http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/index.html?http://www10.antenna.nl/wise/640/5741.php

<snip>

In China, uranium mine employee Sun Xiaodi disappeared at the end of April after reporting contamination from the Gansu No. 792 Uranium Mine in the Gannan Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. The organization Human Rights in China (HRIC) fully supports the efforts of Sun Xiaodi's family and friends to ascertain his whereabouts and secure his release. HRIC urges the international community to press the Chinese authorities to conduct an in-depth investigation into Sun's allegations of corruption, severe human health impacts and environmental degradation at the Gansu No. 792 Uranium Mine.

Australia conducted an inquiry into the future role of its uranium industry. While the inquiry was still ongoing, Australia began formal negotiations on uranium exports to China. China refuses to commit to IAEA inspections of its nuclear power facilities as a condition of buying uranium from Australia, though. China even announced that it wants to explore for uranium in Australia. Meanwhile, Rössing became the first Western producer to export uranium to China (see above).

<snip>

glow slaves anyone???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Lots of evidence that the Chinese don't do things well...
A bit like the bubbling white liquid fiasco.

No numbers though.

Speaking of which, have you sussed out two=2 yet? :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. dupe self-delete
Edited on Thu May-15-08 05:30 AM by jpak
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC