Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quick question about solar cell for the DU scientists...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 12:40 PM
Original message
Quick question about solar cell for the DU scientists...
Edited on Thu May-15-08 12:41 PM by Javaman
How come current solar designs only capture a small percentage of energy?

or to put it another way...

why is their efficiency so low?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quick answer
To capture solar energy, the photon energy has to pop an electron in the solar cell material out of the ground state up into an excited state. Some of the photons are too weak to give the electrons a boost; some that are get reflected right off the surface of the solar cell; some photons hit the solid lattice instead and just give it a good shake. Only if they are just the right energy, hitting at just the right angle, knocking a bound electron in just the right way can they send the electron down the line and turn it into current.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I enjoyed that...eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Okay, me being completely ignorant (at a very scary level I might add)
about photons and electrons, could there be a theoretical way to "contain" the electrons for a bit so as to "knock" off an electron?

I am clearly aware that my ass does my talking in these matters but I figured, I might as well ask. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I was wondering sort of the same thing, but too scared to ask
I was thinking of the so-called "solar tubes" that you can buy as sort of skylights for your home. They're lined with highly reflective material... the light bounces around in there from your roof, through your attic, into your room. So I was wondering if there was anyway to "contain" the photons that way with solar panels.

Sorry to be such a stoopid doofus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You can get more photons with a concentrator
A lens or a mirror can place more photons on a solar cell, thus giving more output.

But this heats up the solar cell, which causes other problems. Many people are working on solving these problems, and IBM just had an announcement this week about ways to cool down the cells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
End Of The Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Containing electrons?
You can do that by charging up a battery. The solar panel makes photovoltaic current that charges a battery until the current is needed later.

Electricity is really a quantity to be used as it is produced. That is why getting it from natural sources instead of from a generator where you can control the fuel flow is problematical. The sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow when it is convenient or needed. That's why solar and wind are good for base loads, but you would always like to have some other generator where you can adjust the output tied into the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You have - inadvertantly I'm sure - got the "base load" issue backwards.
Wind and solar are not useful for baseloads. The best of them have 25% capacity utilization. Even gas plants - which are usually designed for meeting peak loads except in places like California - have higher capacity utilization than wind or solar. Of course, as you correctly state, wind and solar are not avaiable on demand, which is why the need for spinning reserve cuts into their utility.

Spinning reserve is defined generally as the amount of current that can be provided to the grid in less than 30 minutes. Most power grids maintain spinning reserves at about 10% of demand.

Recently, in Germany, reserve requirements maintained because of wind power were mismanaged, plunging much of the country into hours of darkness.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Grid independent
I was thinking of an isolated system where you had a solar panel and a wind generator to keep a battery charged. In that type of a system, when the sun isn't shining and the wind isn't blowing you would need a fueled generator to fall back on to charge up the batteries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-15-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The system you describe has extremely high external costs.
Distributed energy sucks because it is mass intensive and necessarily redundant.

Further, almost by definition, batteries are point source pollutants, even when recycling is attempted.

The distributed energy fantasy reified is the automobile, which has been an unparalleled environmental disaster.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 07:55 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. When you are stuck in the middle of nowhere
Sometimes you have no alternatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC