Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Critics challenge new federal policy on polar bears, demand steps against global warning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 05:07 PM
Original message
Critics challenge new federal policy on polar bears, demand steps against global warning
Critics: Polar bear plan must fight global warming

Critics challenge new federal policy on polar bears, demand steps against global warning

DAN JOLING
AP News

May 20, 2008 15:02 EST


Conservation groups returned to court to challenge Bush administration efforts to help save the polar bear, saying federal officials' refusal to include steps against global warming violates the Endangered Species Act.

In court documents filed late Friday, the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups asked a federal judge to reject Interior Department actions that were announced last week.

Polar bears are threatened with extinction in many areas because of the melting of their sea ice habitat. The groups say greenhouse gas emissions have led to rapid melting in the Arctic.

Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, facing a court deadline because of the groups' earlier lawsuit, had announced Wednesday that polar bears would be listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.

Among the steps he proposed to help them were increasing research and working with Canada to help the bears survive in the wild. But he rejected the addition of broad steps to reduce greenhouse gases, saying he would not allow the Endangered Species Act to be "misused" to regulate global climate change.

more...

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/05/critics_polar_bear_plan_must_f.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-20-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have to say
Edited on Tue May-20-08 06:07 PM by XemaSab
that as an environmental consultant in California, analyzing project impacts to polar bears would be impossible. :shrug:

Yeah, if you're extracting 3 brazilian barrels of oil, the impact is probably hugh, but if you're building a bridge, analyzing the impacts of the equipment used? Not practical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC