Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Midwest: Two 500-year floods in 15 years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:31 AM
Original message
Midwest: Two 500-year floods in 15 years
The U.S. Geological Survey has preliminary data showing that this month's floods on four of Iowa's rivers--the Cedar, Iowa, Shell Rock, and Wapsipinicon--were 500-year floods. Back in 1993, many rivers in the Midwest also experienced 500-year floods, so the region has endured two 500-year floods in the past 15 years. How can this be? First of all a definition--a 500-year flood is an event that has only a 0.2% chance of occurring in a given year, based on available river flow data. Of course, reliable data only goes back a century at most, so designation of a 500-year flood event is somewhat subjective. Still, it seems rather improbable that two such huge floods should occur within such a short time span, raising the question of whether the floods were, in part, human-caused.

In a provocative story in the Washington Post today, it was pointed out that part of the flooding is due to the draining of wetlands for farming purposes. As nature's natural buffers against flooding are drained and filled to provide room for more farmland, run-off and flooding are bound to increase. Furthermore, as more levees are built to protect more valuable farmland and new developments, flood waters are pushed out of the former areas they were allowed to spread out in and forced into river channels behind the new levees. Even higher levees must then be constructed to hold back the increased volume of water they are asked to contain.

Climate change contributing to flooding?
The heaviest types of rains--those likely to cause flooding--have increased in recent years (see my February blog, "The future of flooding", for more detail). According to the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 report, "The frequency of heavy precipitation events has increased over most land areas". Indeed, global warming theory has long predicted an increase in heavy precipitation events. As the climate warms, evaporation of moisture from the oceans increases, resulting in more water vapor in the air. According to the 2007 IPCC report, water vapor in the global atmosphere has increased by about 5% over the 20th century, and 4% since 1970.

Over the U.S., where we have very good precipitation records, annual average precipitation has increased 7% over the past century (Groisman et al., 2004). The same study also found a 14% increase in heavy (top 5%) and 20% increase in very heavy (top 1%) precipitation events over the U.S. in the past century. Kunkel et al. (2003) also found an increase in heavy precipitation events over the U.S. in recent decades, but noted that heavy precipitation events were nearly as frequent at the end of the 19th century and beginning of the 20th century, though the data is not as reliable back then. Thus, climate change is likely partly to blame for increased flooding in the U.S., although we cannot rule out long-term natural variations in precipitation.

http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=965&tstamp=200806
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Can we call them 15 year floods now?
And, plan on seeing more of the same by 2023?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. To 500 year floods in 15 years???!!! INCONCEIVABLE!
Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. In 2004, 2005 & 2006
We had a hundred year flood, a two-hundred fifty year flood and a five-hundred year flood (respectively.) What are the odds, huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. 100 year floods, 500 year floods
are simply a means of predicting the odds of flooding of that magnitude. It doesn't really mean if there is a 100 year flood that you are safe for 99 years. Where I live we have had two 100 year floods in 10 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Absolutely, but...
Edited on Fri Jun-20-08 12:49 PM by OKIsItJustMe
The odds of having a "100 year flood" in any given year are... well... 1 in 100.

That's also the odds of having a "100 year flood" immediately followed by another. (1/100) (Assuming the two events are entirely independent, which is probably not a valid assumption.)

The odds of having a "500 year flood" in any given year are 1 in 500. (0.2%)
The odds of not having a "500 year flood" in any given year (say the year following a previous 500 year flood) are 499 in 500. (99.8%)

The odds of not having a "500 year flood" in the 2 years following (some event) are (499/500)2 (the odds of it not happening in the first year, multiplied by the odds of it not happening in the second year.) That's about 99.6% so the odds of having it happen are about 0.4%

The odds of not having a "500 year flood" in the 15 years following (some event) are (499/500)15 which comes to about 97%, which makes the odds of it happening (by pure chance) are about 3% (so, very unlikely, but far from impossible.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-21-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Oops. Our bad," said USGS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC