Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First hydrogen fuel cell for the home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 07:53 AM
Original message
First hydrogen fuel cell for the home
http://www.mnn.com/earth-matters/energy/stories/first-hydrogen-fuel-cell-for-the-home

Japanese electronics company Matsushita, best known for its Panasonic line of home electronics and appliances, will claim first place in the race to put commercial home fuel cells on the market, but a slew of other companies are in tow.

The fuel cell can optimally provide 70 percent of the energy needs for a 1,280 square foot house with four people. According to Matsushita, the cell can reduce energy consumption by 22 percent and CO2 emissions by 12 percent as compared to all other power sources. The unit is guaranteed to last 40,000 hours, which amounts to ten years of operation, roughly the same amount of time it will take a consumer in Japan to recoup their initial investment. (The government will subsidize the purchase, although how much remains undetermined. The company estimates a $10,000 investment by consumers.)

Customers will purchase the fuel cell system from a local gas company, who will install it, a fairly simple process says Matsushita.

While fuel cell technology takes many different forms, in this case, the cogeneration home fuel cell hooks up to the city’s natural gas lines, extracting hydrogen from the gas in a fuel-processing device. The stream of hydrogen is combined with oxygen through a series of polyelectrolyte membranes, a process that creates electricity, heat, and water. The home fuel cell produces between 500 watts and a 1 kilowatt of electricity and captures the heat to warm a tank of water, used for showers, dishes etc.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure if it adds up...
Edited on Wed Apr-01-09 09:49 AM by tinrobot
A 12% reduction in CO2 emissions is paltry, and $10 grand is a significant investment. Plus, you still need to buy the natural gas, and the system only produces 1KW (which is not all that much)

Right now, 1KW of grid-tie solar costs around $6-7 grand without installation, plus you get tax credits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Remember, it's also more energy efficient
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=192071&mesg_id=192071
… the cell can reduce energy consumption by 22 percent …


Not everyone can install 1KW of grid-tied solar…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. What are these numbers measured against?
It emits 12% less CO2... what exactly are the measuring this 12% against? Other fuel cells? Other forms of energy?

What does the 22% less "energy consumption" mean exactly? Is it a measure of the efficiency of the unit itself? Does it include the fact that it heats water? Again - measured against what, exactly?

True, not everyone can install solar, but for those who can, it seems to be a better option.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. (See below)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Water heating
I read it so you didn't have to...

It's 22% more efficient at heating water over a "conventional system" (whatever that means)

So, 12% less CO2 for power generation and 22% better at heating water. Again - not all that impressive for $10 grand and a 10 year replacement cycle.

Solar water heaters are cheap and a lot more than 22% more efficient. On-demand water heating can use up to 50% less power than a "conventional system"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yup. How long have solar hot water heaters been around?
More than a century:


This is the first home fuel cell marketed to the public. I'm thinking that given a little time they may improve.

However, once again, many people (think Japanese apartment dwellers for example) have no suitable place to install a solar system. (This system, they can.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Useful stats and such
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Not a fair comparision
Comparing a 1kw fuel cell to a 1kw solar system is not fair. The two do not remotely produce the same amount of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. And the 1KW solar system doesn't burn natural gas
Edited on Wed Apr-01-09 06:19 PM by OKIsItJustMe
So, it's "unfair" a number of ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC