Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The reality of nuclear energy is inconsistent with dreams of a renaissance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 12:15 PM
Original message
The reality of nuclear energy is inconsistent with dreams of a renaissance
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/cif-green/2010/aug/16/nuclear-energy-renaissance

Repeatedly in recent years there have been calls for a revival of nuclear power. Yet that renaissance never seems to come.

Of the more than 200 countries in the world, only 30 use nuclear power. In July 2010, a total of 439 nuclear power plants with a net installed capacity of 373.038 gigawatts (GW) were connected to various national electricity grids, about 1.2GW more than at the beginning of 2006.

Roughly 16% of total energy needs (up to 25% in the highly industrialised countries) are now met by electric energy. Nuclear fission's contribution to total electric energy has decreased from about 18% more than 10 years ago to about 14% in 2008. On a worldwide scale, nuclear energy is thus only a small component of the global energy mix, and its share, contrary to widespread belief, is not on the rise.

During 2009, for example, nuclear power plants provided 2,560 terawatt hours (TWh)– equivalent to 2,560bn kilowatt hours of electric energy, about 1.6% lower than during 2008 and almost 4% lower than during the record year of 2006. Early results for the first four months of 2010 for the OECD countries indicate that so far the 2010 results are as low or lower than last year.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh please.
Of the more than 200 countries in the world, only 30 use nuclear power.

What a ridiculous standard. Did you know that of the more than 200 countries in the world, only a handful (3?) have traditional (CATOBAR) aircraft carriers. Obviously that means that they're a mistake, right?

How many countries have thermal-storage solar plants? What conclusions can we draw?

It is the author's multi-year campaign to convince others that nuclear is not a part of the solution... that is itself inconsistent with reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-16-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Inconsistent with your reality maybe
but not for many of us. Nuclear energy is neither safe, cheap nor co2 neutral and no amount of bull will change that. Waste, can you grasp that concept? I've been told that the solution to the disposal waste is just around the corner for 50 or so years now and it's not here yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC