Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge Reinstates Rule Protecting Old-Growth Cedar, Spruce, Hemlock In Tongass N.F.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:34 PM
Original message
Federal Judge Reinstates Rule Protecting Old-Growth Cedar, Spruce, Hemlock In Tongass N.F.
SAN FRANCISCO — A federal district judge has reinstated a Clinton-era regulation that prevented logging on old stands of hemlock, cedar and spruce trees in large stretches of the Tongass National Forest in Alaska.

The judge, John W. Sedwick, ruled that a Bush administration decision to reverse course and allow tree-cutting was made for reasons that he called “implausible, contrary to the evidence in the record” and in conflict with judicial precedents.

The State of Alaska had intervened in support of the federal government, arguing that closing off areas open to logging would cost jobs. But in his ruling, handed down late Friday, Judge Sedwick said evidence presented in the case showed that logging in southeastern Alaska has been declining in any case. At 16.8 million acres, the Tongass is the largest component of the national forest system. It was the center of a battle in the 1990s between the timber industry and environmental groups and has a strong emotional pull for environmentalists as a remnant of the primeval immensity of the North American wilderness.

The initial Clinton-era rule, issued in 2001, prohibited logging roads in 9.5 million acres of the forest. The Bush administration’s partial reversal potentially opened 2.3 million roadless acres to logging trucks. For the past seven years, administrative rulings by the federal Forest Service and by federal courts have veered in one direction and then another, on the status of the “roadless rule” and federal protections for old-growth timber. The current case was brought by a local village, Kake, which sought to preserve the acreage for recreational use.

EDIT

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/08/science/earth/08roadless.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Edited on Tue Mar-08-11 07:45 PM by pscot
Good news is rare enough to celibrate. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC