|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:53 AM Original message |
Judgment Day arrives for Ralph Nader's "Catch 22" on nuke waste |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:55 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, the current crisis is all the fault of Nader and anti-nuke folks... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:59 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. If the OP had said anything resembling that, I would agree. It didn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:05 AM Response to Reply #3 |
6. I beg to differ: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. You've changed your claim, and now I partially agree with you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 07:58 AM Response to Original message |
2. He did his job well. And now we are living with the fear and the consequences of that fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jan Steinman (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
32. Proud to have "wasted" my vote! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:09 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Wasted? Hardly! Did you enjoy 8 years of Bush? Brought to you by Ralph Nader. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 09:28 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. Well, I'm glad to see that the BC vote went for Nader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. That is assuming that there is a "safe" method to deal with nuclear waste. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. Nader doesn't have a consistent stance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:08 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. I didn't say he has. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. You believe that storage of nuclear waste at over 120 sites across the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:36 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. I think in both cases safety is an illusion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:42 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. "Safe storage" and "end storage" are myths advanced by anti-nuke activists. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:47 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I totally agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Buzz Clik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:15 AM Response to Reply #4 |
10. So, it's better to leave that crap sitting out in pools of water for a gazillion years? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Democracyinkind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Put it undeground as soon as we stop producing more of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
24. Obama's not going to stop producing more of it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Myrina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
11. Wait, because he was anti-nukes, it's his fault that we have a nuclear disaster in Japan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
abqmufc (590 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:37 AM Response to Original message |
13. Correct, b/c Yucca sits on a fault line, is a dormant volcano and is sacred to 13 Tribes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 08:55 AM Response to Original message |
17. Deleted message |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
18. Nuclear wastes can be recycled into new fuel. We need to do that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:13 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. That isn't true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kristopher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
19. The balance seems wrong to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
21. The trouble at Fukushima has nothing to do with long-term waste disposal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 11:56 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. It does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. Your post doesn't demonstrate that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:19 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Of course it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:39 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. The volume of spent fuel isn't the same thing as the "volume of radioactivity" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 12:53 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Fine, you disagree with "many scientists and engineers". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 01:07 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. There isn't anything to contradict that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 01:16 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Again, you've produced nothing to back that up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FBaggins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 01:43 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Yes... that's what I'm saying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Apr-07-11 02:42 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. The stuffing is happening at least partly because there is no repository. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC