Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Highlands: A Wildlife Corridor, Green but Imperiled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
pmbryant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-08-03 04:13 PM
Original message
Highlands: A Wildlife Corridor, Green but Imperiled
From the NY Times: July 8 2003

A Wildlife Corridor, Green but Imperiled

By JAMES GORMAN

It stretches from the forests of the North to the farmlands in the South, from woodlands where bobcats scream and cerulean warblers warble to lawns where deer and groundhogs graze.

More than 4.5 million people drink water drawn from its aquifers. Fourteen million people use it each year for recreation, more than visit Yellowstone, Yosemite and the Grand Canyon combined. Twenty-five million people live within an hour's drive.

It has been mapped, studied and reported on. Conservationists are trying to preserve as much of it as possible. And the Forest Service says much of it could be gone in a few decades.

Still, it does not have much of an identity in the public consciousness. To geologists, it is the Reading Prong, a wide swath of hills and ridges that are the nubs of the ancient Appalachian Mountains, worn down by 250 million years of wind and rain and now facing the final insult of having McMansions with 10-acre lawns built on their flanks.

It is the Highlands region, stretching from northwestern Connecticut through New York and New Jersey and on into Pennsylvania — about two million acres of public and private land, developed and undeveloped, dotted with reservoirs and parks, but under intense development pressure.

(snip)

A bill being considered in House and Senate committees may create the first national stewardship area. Not a national park or a national forest, the Highlands Stewardship Area, if approved, would be a new sort of preservation entity created for a region where no wilderness is left, where the sweeping actions that created vast protected parks and forests are impossible.

(snip)



More: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/08/science/earth/08CORR.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC