Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WH Task Force Advises More Weatherization $ - Bush Budget Cuts It By 1/3

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 01:13 PM
Original message
WH Task Force Advises More Weatherization $ - Bush Budget Cuts It By 1/3
WASHINGTON - Democratic lawmakers on Thursday slammed the Bush administration's proposal to cut funds for a government program that helps poor people “weatherize” their homes, even though the White House's energy task force recommended increasing money for the program.

The administration wants to gut 32 percent of the money in the Energy Department's budget for weatherisation assistance grants, which help low-income families buy storm windows and insulation for their homes to make them more energy-efficient. The program's funding would fall to $164.2 million. Sen. Jeff Bingaman, the top Democrat on the Senate Energy Committee, said slashing the program's funds did not make much sense "at a time when home energy bills are at historically high levels."

Bingaman, speaking at committee hearing on the Energy Department budget, pointed out President Bush pledged during this 2000 campaign to nearly double funding for the program and the White House energy task force headed by Vice President Dick Cheney called for more weatherisation funds. The administration's request of $164.2 million for the weatherisation program is not only a cut, but is also short of the $600 million Congress authorized for the program in a sweeping energy bill that Bush signed into law last August.

Energy Secretary Sam Bodman defended what he described as a "painful" cut in the program's budget, saying the department had a limited amount of money and it was targeted to programs that have the most promising results. "I personally made this decision (to reduce the weatherisation funds) as it came across my desk, and it was strictly knowing how much money I had to spend and where I had to put the funds," he said.

EDIT

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/35062/story.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, what are these other programs that are more promising?
What would be more promising than a long term solution that will reduce heating costs in winter as well as cooling costs in summer for a number of years after it was recieved?

Direct heating assistance payments to utility companies that have no subsequent benefit to the household after the payment is made?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Let's have no more of this personal virtue nonsense, NCEvilDUer!!
Everyone knows that conservation is for weak girly-men like Jimmy Carter.

Real men spend wastefully!!!

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-13-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The plan is clear
global warming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC