http://www.iea.org/Textbase/stats/renewoecd.asp?oecd=Austria&SubmitB=Submit&COUNTRY_LONG_NAME=AustriaI have taken the liberty of converting all this energy to exajoules. My calculations show that Austria produced 0.148 exajoules of electricity via the renewable means listed. Of this, 94.1% was represented by hydroelectricity, power that will be available until the Austrian glaciers are gone with global climate change.
Austria produced another 0.0043 exajoules of thermal renewable energy, dominated by "solid biomass," presumably wood, 72% of the renewable thermal and followed by municipal waste burning, 18%.
Overall, 92% of the renewable energy in Austria is provided by hydroelectric power. The next largest source is "solid biomass," again presumably wood, at 3.9% of the total renewable output.
The total renewable output of Austria, thermal + electric was 0.151 exajoules.
According the the Energy Information Agency, not the IEA, the use of primary energy in Austria was 1.535 exajoules.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/international/iealf/tablee1.xlsAll figures, IEA and EIA, are for 2003.
The percentage of renewable energy produced in Austria is therefore, ignoring the small efficiency considerations for forms of energy that are
not hydroelectric, is slightly under 10%. Almost all of this energy is hydroelectric power, which is not surprising for a mountainous country like Austria. As I indicated, they're going to have a problem on their hands if their glaciers disappear.