Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EPA Recognizes Landfill-Gas Methane Projects

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 12:12 PM
Original message
EPA Recognizes Landfill-Gas Methane Projects
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story;jsessionid=aMhWa3sGHZ_5?id

Washington, DC The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recognized the latest accomplishments of landfill-gas methane partners who have reduced emissions of methane and created renewable energy sources.

<snip>

EPA has assisted in the development of more than 200 landfill gas energy projects in the past 10 years. In 2005 alone, landfill gas energy projects in the U.S. provided more than 9 billion kilowatt hours of electricity and 74 billion cubic feet of gas for corporate and government end users. The emissions reductions associated with these projects last year were equal to those from 13 million vehicles. The energy equivalent would be powering 725,000 homes and heating 1.2 million homes.

<more>




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. 9 billion kWh exceeds the output of a 1000 MW power plant
not bad for a "niche" energy source...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 9 terawatt hours is about 0.03% of the energy we used last year.
So, I think I'll stick with "niche power source"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'll remember that when the first of Dick Cheney's 1000 MW
nucular power plants opens (ten years from now)...

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes... that's exactly it!
Any gigawatt power plant is insignificant, compared to what we need to avert disaster. A gigawatt is pretty close to 1/1000 of what we need, regardless of how it's being produced. (Or, if we cut our energy budget in half, it's 1/500 of what we need)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. We have one in our county
The landfill gas is piped at a rate of about 1,000 cubic feet per minute to three 1,400 horsepower gas engines. These internal combustion engines, installed in 2000 replacing the original gas turbine engine, are designed to operate on landfill gas or natural gas. The three gas engines, which operate 24 hours per day, are used to turn electrical generators rated at 1 megawatt each. Annual electrical output is approximately 15 million-kilowatt hours.

The electrical power that is generated by this system is connected directly to the Wisconsin Public Service Corporation power grid in the Oshkosh area where it supplies the equivalent of about 900 residential homes.

For an added bonus, the capping of the garbage mounds helps reduce the seagull problem too ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The one in my county is used by a local paper mill
n/tg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The air pollution caused by these big diesels is not insignificant.
Beats burning coal, I suppose.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No such thing as a free lunch.
But the net environmental impact is significantly lower than not harnessing the methane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. This is true. Methane is a very potent GHG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC