Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MT Governor's Call For Climate Panel Met With "Stunning" Response

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:34 PM
Original message
MT Governor's Call For Climate Panel Met With "Stunning" Response
GREAT FALLS - Gov. Brian Schweitzer's call for people to serve on a new state committee examining climate change has drawn a stunning response, members soon will be named and their inaugural meeting likely will be in late May or early June, a state administrator says. “The overwhelming reaction I seem to be getting now is ‘It's about time,' ” said Richard Opper, head of the Montana Department of Environmental Quality.

Climate studies in western Montana show spring weather arrives two to three weeks earlier than it did 50 years ago. Missoula's annual average temperature is up 2 degrees over the same period, and the number of frost-free days in the growing season increased by about 16.

“As every winter ticks by and we keep not getting the winters we used to, I'm having more people who are saying, ‘Uh-oh, there seems to be more to this than year-to-year variability,' ” said Steve Running, an ecology professor at the University of Montana School of Forestry. Schweitzer directed Opper to form a Climate Change Advisory Group that will study how warmer conditions affect Montana. The governor wants to have a Climate Change Action Plan in hand by next year.

Opper said states must take the lead in dealing with the climate issue. The frequency of drought in the West is a clear indicator of major change, he told the Great Falls Tribune. “Just how big of a two-by-four do we need to be hit over the head with?” he said. “To have two severe droughts back to back, it's hard to avoid connecting the dots. Most of us recognize there is something serious going on here.”

EDIT

http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2006/02/28/news/mtregional/znews06.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. many states are Way Ahead of the Feds on the eviroment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfkrfk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-01-06 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. nice to see the feds staying out of state issues .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's going to take individual states like CA
and MT and others to make this a national issue.....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I keep telling folks that progressivism is overdue and will likely
start in flyover country instead of the yuppie cities of both coasts.

The DNC needs to start listening to Gov. Schweitzer and tuning out the established New Dems within the I-495 beltway.

If they don't, they'll continue to lose. And they'll deserve it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska will NEVER believe in climate change
Even if every glacier in his state turns liquid and trickles to the sea.

The man is a true paleo-con; so primitive it is frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is Mr. Coal Liquefaction, right????
How is this scheme supposed to address global climate change????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
megatherium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Probably by making lots of money for the carbon energy companies.
I know that doesn't make any sense, but you asked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC