Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Largest AK Refinery Threatens To Close Unless State Ponies Up $100M

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:39 PM
Original message
Largest AK Refinery Threatens To Close Unless State Ponies Up $100M
ANCHORAGE - The owner of the state's largest crude oil refinery has threatened to close the plant unless the state grants it a major financial concession. Flint Hills Resources, operator of the refinery at North Pole, is asking for a contract change that could cost Alaska up to $100 million, state officials said.

Refinery executives worry the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission might lower tariffs early next year for transporting oil through the nearby trans-Alaska pipeline. Flint Hills buys oil from the state to run its refinery. Under its supply contract, Flint Hills would have to pay the state more if federal regulators lower the rates.

Flint Hills buys crude oil from the state, but gets to deduct the tariff from the price. A lowered tariff rate would be applied to the company's rates in past years, meaning it would have to make retroactive payments to the state. In a letter to the state this month, Flint Hills chief financial officer Anthony Sementelli asked that the supply contract be altered so that the retroactive payment wouldn't be required.

EDIT

State oil and gas director Bill Van Dyke, in a letter back to Flint Hills on Friday, declined the company's request. He said all parties, including Flint Hills, knew when the oil supply contract was negotiated in early 2004 that disputes before federal officials over pipeline tariffs were likely and could affect the oil price retroactively. The state and hired consultant also would need to examine financial information from Flint Hills to verify how much damage a back payment would do.

EDIT

http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/022706/sta_20060227010.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rkc3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-28-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. First of all...
When Dominion Peoples (here in PA) got a rate increase two years ago - I got stuck with a $1,200 bill retroactive to the date of filing for the increase - a big fuck you very much for being a customer.

Secondly - personal welfare = Bad/Evil/Librul BUT Corporate Welfare = Good, Compassionate Conservatism. (How this works out I'll never know.) I suspect they'll get the $100MM to keep the refinery in AK.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC