Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cape Wind to Increase Power by 7 Percent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 10:18 AM
Original message
Cape Wind to Increase Power by 7 Percent
http://www.renewableenergyaccess.com/rea/news/story?id=46163

Yarmouth Port, Massachusetts The Cape Wind project is planning to boost annual production of clean wind energy by 7 percent by using more efficient turbines -- specifically the new GE 3.6 Megawatt model xl. The annual expected wind power for the proposed project will now be 1,594,207 megawatt hours (MWh), up from 1,489,200 MWh.

Although the maximum output of the turbines is unchanged at 3.6 megawatts (MW), the new model is more productive during light wind conditions. The new wind turbines are slightly taller than the proposed previous turbines, but the 5 percent increase in height will not noticeably change the visual impact of the project from land.

Cape Wind is also planning to substantially reduce the number of red aviation lights from 260 down to 57, an elimination of 203 lights. This updated aviation lighting plan is consistent with the new wind farm lighting guidelines being used by the FAA.

Previously, each wind turbine was planned to have two red aviation lights; under the new plan, only the wind turbines on the perimeter of the project footprint, and the wind turbines next to the electric service platform, will each have one light on the top of the turbine nacelle.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-06-06 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hope this doesn't delay the project
The only downside I see is. These "Changes" may be used by opponnets to try and force further reviews of the project. Stating that since changes were made we need to re-revied the visual impact and affects upon aviation and anything else t try and stop the project.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC